Total Commodity Programs in Butler County, Kansas, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,172
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Butler County, Kansas totaled $30,082,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Klingenberg Farms Inc | Peabody, KS 66866 | $1,073,621 |
2 | Henry Creek Farms Inc | Whitewater, KS 67154 | $1,036,469 |
3 | La Land And Cattle Inc | Benton, KS 67017 | $980,563 |
4 | Promax Inc | Whitewater, KS 67154 | $918,640 |
5 | Penner Enterprises, Inc | Whitewater, KS 67154 | $826,577 |
6 | Wiebe Land & Cattle Inc | Burns, KS 66840 | $785,424 |
7 | Triple T Livestock LLC | Whitewater, KS 67154 | $785,231 |
8 | Jcs General Partnership | Garden City, KS 67846 | $745,751 |
9 | Mcclure Brothers Land & Cattle Operating Ptr | Douglass, KS 67039 | $744,215 |
10 | Penner Inc | Whitewater, KS 67154 | $642,535 |
11 | Bruce Penner Inc | Whitewater, KS 67154 | $512,819 |
12 | Vestring Ranch | Cassoday, KS 66842 | $482,312 |
13 | Gary Wedel | Burns, KS 66840 | $372,961 |
14 | Harder Farms Inc | Whitewater, KS 67154 | $358,651 |
15 | Bar K Cattle, LLC | Burns, KS 66840 | $346,074 |
16 | Lone Willow Farm Inc | Burns, KS 66840 | $339,305 |
17 | J & C Farm & Livestock Inc | Whitewater, KS 67154 | $331,765 |
18 | Thiessen Farms Inc | Burns, KS 66840 | $320,661 |
19 | Sparrowhawk Inc | Newton, KS 67114 | $314,651 |
20 | Mdm Land And Cattle General Partnership | Douglass, KS 67039 | $300,239 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>