Emergency Conservation payments in Connecticut totaled $621,564 from 1995-2020‡.
States Receiving Emergency Conservation payments, 1995-2020‡
| Rank | State | Emergency Conservation 1995-2020‡ | Pct of Total | Running Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | North Carolina | $94,941,936 | 7.9% | 7.9% |
| 2 | Florida | $81,752,078 | 6.8% | 14.6% |
| 3 | Texas | $76,364,450 | 6.3% | 21.0% |
| 4 | Missouri | $73,386,126 | 6.1% | 27.1% |
| 5 | Georgia | $72,871,363 | 6.0% | 33.1% |
| 6 | Oklahoma | $59,738,131 | 5.0% | 38.1% |
| 7 | California | $51,672,273 | 4.3% | 42.3% |
| 8 | Mississippi | $51,459,680 | 4.3% | 46.6% |
| 9 | South Dakota | $51,038,667 | 4.2% | 50.8% |
| 10 | Alabama | $51,006,512 | 4.2% | 55.1% |
| 11 | Kentucky | $48,948,224 | 4.1% | 59.1% |
| 12 | Arkansas | $46,051,327 | 3.8% | 62.9% |
| 13 | Nebraska | $39,861,118 | 3.3% | 66.2% |
| 14 | Iowa | $38,955,008 | 3.2% | 69.5% |
| 15 | Montana | $37,953,396 | 3.1% | 72.6% |
| 16 | Louisiana | $29,590,324 | 2.5% | 75.1% |
| 17 | Tennessee | $28,130,850 | 2.3% | 77.4% |
| 18 | South Carolina | $23,679,494 | 2.0% | 79.4% |
| 19 | Washington | $20,628,448 | 1.7% | 81.1% |
| 20 | Kansas | $19,393,047 | 1.6% | 82.7% |
| 21 | Virginia | $18,985,361 | 1.6% | 84.3% |
| 22 | Hawaii | $17,735,300 | 1.5% | 85.7% |
| 23 | New York | $16,144,524 | 1.3% | 87.1% |
| 24 | Oregon | $15,200,589 | 1.3% | 88.3% |
| 25 | West Virginia | $13,189,899 | 1.1% | 89.4% |
| 26 | Ohio | $12,821,365 | 1.1% | 90.5% |
| 27 | Colorado | $11,769,300 | 1.0% | 91.5% |
| 28 | Illinois | $11,003,172 | 0.9% | 92.4% |
| 29 | Wyoming | $9,892,093 | 0.8% | 93.2% |
| 30 | Idaho | $9,816,049 | 0.8% | 94.0% |
| 31 | Indiana | $7,059,928 | 0.6% | 94.6% |
| 32 | Vermont | $6,983,967 | 0.6% | 95.2% |
| 33 | New Mexico | $6,965,025 | 0.6% | 95.7% |
| 34 | Pennsylvania | $6,374,784 | 0.5% | 96.3% |
| 35 | Nevada | $6,278,749 | 0.5% | 96.8% |
| 36 | Massachusetts | $5,932,393 | 0.5% | 97.3% |
| 37 | Utah | $5,652,922 | 0.5% | 97.8% |
| 38 | Minnesota | $5,616,105 | 0.5% | 98.2% |
| 39 | Maine | $3,554,387 | 0.3% | 98.5% |
| 40 | Wisconsin | $3,450,554 | 0.3% | 98.8% |
| 41 | North Dakota | $3,396,421 | 0.3% | 99.1% |
| 42 | Arizona | $3,238,958 | 0.3% | 99.3% |
| 43 | New Hampshire | $2,234,044 | 0.2% | 99.5% |
| 44 | Michigan | $1,601,314 | 0.1% | 99.7% |
| 45 | New Jersey | $1,591,578 | 0.1% | 99.8% |
| 46 | Maryland | $1,509,920 | 0.1% | 99.9% |
| 47 | Connecticut | $621,564 | 0.1% | 100.0% |
| 48 | Rhode Island | $240,482 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 49 | Delaware | $57,974 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
Source: Environmental Working Group. Compiled from USDA data.
‡ Data for 2020 includes payments made by USDA through June 30, 2020 and does not include crop insurance premium subsidies.
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf