SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program payments in Bracken County, Kentucky totaled $25,611 from 1995-2021.
States Receiving SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program payments, 1995-2021
| Rank | State | SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program 1995-2021 | Pct of Total | Running Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Texas | $1,009,561,728 | 20.1% | 20.1% |
| 2 | North Dakota | $639,628,688 | 12.7% | 32.8% |
| 3 | Kansas | $447,707,834 | 8.9% | 41.7% |
| 4 | Iowa | $389,825,887 | 7.8% | 49.5% |
| 5 | Oklahoma | $209,870,148 | 4.2% | 53.7% |
| 6 | Illinois | $185,224,363 | 3.7% | 57.4% |
| 7 | South Dakota | $168,423,747 | 3.4% | 60.7% |
| 8 | Missouri | $167,563,887 | 3.3% | 64.0% |
| 9 | Ohio | $148,972,118 | 3.0% | 67.0% |
| 10 | Minnesota | $147,280,645 | 2.9% | 69.9% |
| 11 | Indiana | $145,591,705 | 2.9% | 72.8% |
| 12 | Colorado | $144,468,588 | 2.9% | 75.7% |
| 13 | Montana | $136,759,137 | 2.7% | 78.4% |
| 14 | Nebraska | $131,625,679 | 2.6% | 81.0% |
| 15 | Washington | $121,265,834 | 2.4% | 83.5% |
| 16 | North Carolina | $102,239,546 | 2.0% | 85.5% |
| 17 | Wisconsin | $91,130,396 | 1.8% | 87.3% |
| 18 | Georgia | $74,075,221 | 1.5% | 88.8% |
| 19 | Kentucky | $56,449,281 | 1.1% | 89.9% |
| 20 | California | $48,744,511 | 1.0% | 90.9% |
| 21 | Oregon | $43,888,588 | 0.9% | 91.7% |
| 22 | Michigan | $42,652,637 | 0.8% | 92.6% |
| 23 | Tennessee | $41,420,260 | 0.8% | 93.4% |
| 24 | Alabama | $40,822,395 | 0.8% | 94.2% |
| 25 | Florida | $40,768,801 | 0.8% | 95.0% |
| 26 | Virginia | $40,387,060 | 0.8% | 95.9% |
| 27 | Idaho | $29,561,613 | 0.6% | 96.4% |
| 28 | New Mexico | $26,845,363 | 0.5% | 97.0% |
| 29 | Louisiana | $22,877,510 | 0.5% | 97.4% |
| 30 | Mississippi | $21,789,539 | 0.4% | 97.9% |
| 31 | Arkansas | $18,345,921 | 0.4% | 98.2% |
| 32 | South Carolina | $13,230,069 | 0.3% | 98.5% |
| 33 | Maryland | $11,578,266 | 0.2% | 98.7% |
| 34 | Vermont | $9,169,896 | 0.2% | 98.9% |
| 35 | Puerto Rico | $7,809,833 | 0.2% | 99.1% |
| 36 | Delaware | $7,500,826 | 0.1% | 99.2% |
| 37 | Connecticut | $7,347,155 | 0.1% | 99.4% |
| 38 | New Jersey | $6,422,364 | 0.1% | 99.5% |
| 39 | New York | $5,986,237 | 0.1% | 99.6% |
| 40 | Massachusetts | $5,701,857 | 0.1% | 99.7% |
| 41 | Pennsylvania | $3,509,968 | 0.1% | 99.8% |
| 42 | Wyoming | $2,716,970 | 0.1% | 99.8% |
| 43 | Utah | $2,597,120 | 0.1% | 99.9% |
| 44 | Nevada | $1,701,180 | 0.0% | 99.9% |
| 45 | Arizona | $1,065,727 | 0.0% | 99.9% |
| 46 | Maine | $750,314 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 47 | Hawaii | $717,238 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 48 | New Hampshire | $416,166 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 49 | Rhode Island | $314,024 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 50 | West Virginia | $289,556 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 51 | Alaska | $262,567 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
Source: Environmental Working Group. Compiled from USDA data.
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf