Production Flexibility Program payments in Saint Charles County, Missouri totaled $12.6 million from 1995-2021.
States Receiving Production Flexibility Program payments, 1995-2021
| Rank | State | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2021 | Pct of Total | Running Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Iowa | $3,315,045,270 | 9.4% | 9.4% |
| 2 | Texas | $3,057,461,715 | 8.6% | 18.0% |
| 3 | Illinois | $2,921,517,284 | 8.2% | 26.2% |
| 4 | Kansas | $2,535,293,063 | 7.2% | 33.4% |
| 5 | Nebraska | $2,487,001,085 | 7.0% | 40.4% |
| 6 | Minnesota | $1,997,113,044 | 5.6% | 46.0% |
| 7 | Arkansas | $1,673,264,015 | 4.7% | 50.8% |
| 8 | North Dakota | $1,609,777,745 | 4.5% | 55.3% |
| 9 | Indiana | $1,438,601,378 | 4.1% | 59.4% |
| 10 | California | $1,266,288,870 | 3.6% | 62.9% |
| 11 | Missouri | $1,092,664,198 | 3.1% | 66.0% |
| 12 | South Dakota | $1,014,727,888 | 2.9% | 68.9% |
| 13 | Ohio | $981,329,453 | 2.8% | 71.7% |
| 14 | Oklahoma | $975,923,780 | 2.8% | 74.4% |
| 15 | Louisiana | $885,128,593 | 2.5% | 76.9% |
| 16 | Mississippi | $841,398,686 | 2.4% | 79.3% |
| 17 | Montana | $828,389,532 | 2.3% | 81.6% |
| 18 | Wisconsin | $777,007,790 | 2.2% | 83.8% |
| 19 | Michigan | $611,226,362 | 1.7% | 85.5% |
| 20 | Colorado | $606,404,880 | 1.7% | 87.2% |
| 21 | Washington | $594,315,946 | 1.7% | 88.9% |
| 22 | Georgia | $485,976,189 | 1.4% | 90.3% |
| 23 | Idaho | $452,259,650 | 1.3% | 91.6% |
| 24 | North Carolina | $394,440,235 | 1.1% | 92.7% |
| 25 | Kentucky | $359,712,834 | 1.0% | 93.7% |
| 26 | Tennessee | $350,461,786 | 1.0% | 94.7% |
| 27 | Arizona | $272,223,324 | 0.8% | 95.5% |
| 28 | Alabama | $245,022,968 | 0.7% | 96.1% |
| 29 | Oregon | $237,361,912 | 0.7% | 96.8% |
| 30 | New York | $190,274,840 | 0.5% | 97.4% |
| 31 | South Carolina | $184,860,567 | 0.5% | 97.9% |
| 32 | Pennsylvania | $146,127,966 | 0.4% | 98.3% |
| 33 | Virginia | $134,902,886 | 0.4% | 98.7% |
| 34 | New Mexico | $126,823,085 | 0.4% | 99.0% |
| 35 | Maryland | $99,369,724 | 0.3% | 99.3% |
| 36 | Wyoming | $53,497,995 | 0.2% | 99.5% |
| 37 | Florida | $50,808,039 | 0.1% | 99.6% |
| 38 | Utah | $46,748,683 | 0.1% | 99.7% |
| 39 | Delaware | $29,402,289 | 0.1% | 99.8% |
| 40 | New Jersey | $17,182,705 | 0.0% | 99.9% |
| 41 | West Virginia | $13,762,321 | 0.0% | 99.9% |
| 42 | Vermont | $9,221,965 | 0.0% | 99.9% |
| 43 | Nevada | $6,475,238 | 0.0% | 99.9% |
| 44 | Connecticut | $5,819,198 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 45 | Maine | $5,337,496 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 46 | Massachusetts | $3,727,021 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 47 | New Hampshire | $2,698,550 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 48 | Alaska | $794,714 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 49 | Rhode Island | $192,728 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
Source: Environmental Working Group. Compiled from USDA data.
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf