Total Price Loss Coverage payments in 24th District of California (Rep. Salud Carbajal) totaled $431,390 from 1995-2017.
Congressional Districts in 24th District of California (Rep. Salud Carbajal) Receiving Total Price Loss Coverage payments, 1995-2017
Rank |
District |
Total Price Loss Coverage 1995-2017 | Pct of Total | Running Percentage |
1 | 21st District of California (Rep. David Valado) | $19,686,408 | 32.7% | 32.7% |
2 | 22nd District of California (Rep. Devin Nunes) | $8,163,895 | 13.6% | 46.3% |
3 | 16th District of California (Rep. Jim Costa) | $7,101,322 | 11.8% | 58.1% |
4 | 3rd District of California (Rep. John Garamendi) | $5,405,222 | 9.0% | 67.1% |
5 | 1st District of California (Rep. Doug LaMalfa) | $4,894,475 | 8.1% | 75.3% |
6 | 51st District of California (Rep. Juan Vargas) | $4,583,808 | 7.6% | 82.9% |
7 | 10th District of California (Rep. Jeff Denham) | $3,158,627 | 5.3% | 88.1% |
8 | 36th District of California (Rep. Raul Ruiz) | $1,106,786 | 1.8% | 90.0% |
9 | 23rd District of California (Rep. Kevin McCarthy) | $1,082,261 | 1.8% | 91.8% |
10 | 24th District of California (Rep. Salud Carbajal) | $431,390 | 0.7% | 92.5% |
11 | 9th District of California (Rep. Jerry McNerney) | $196,213 | 0.3% | 92.8% |
12 | 4th District of California (Rep. Tom McClintock) | $179,597 | 0.3% | 93.1% |
13 | 20th District of California (Rep. Jimmy Panetta) | $172,074 | 0.3% | 93.4% |
14 | 15th District of California (Rep. Eric Swalwell) | $166,512 | 0.3% | 93.7% |
15 | 6th District of California (Rep. Doris Matsui) | $109,842 | 0.2% | 93.9% |
16 | 7th District of California (Rep. Ami Bera) | $77,473 | 0.1% | 94.0% |
17 | 42nd District of California (Rep. Ken Calvert) | $14,011 | 0.0% | 94.0% |
18 | 19th District of California (Rep. Zoe Lofgren) | $12,270 | 0.0% | 94.0% |
19 | 8th District of California (Rep. Paul Cook) | $5,365 | 0.0% | 94.1% |
20 | 25th District of California (Rep. Steve Knight) | $5,335 | 0.0% | 94.1% |
21 | 2nd District of California (Rep. Jared Huffman) | $2,830 | 0.0% | 94.1% |
NOTE: Not all recipients were able to be placed into Congressional Districts
so the District total may not total 100%. Nationally 96% of all program monies were designated into a Congressional District
Source: Environmental Working Group. Compiled from USDA data.