Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) payments in 6th District of Minnesota (Rep. Tom Emmer) totaled $0 from 1995-2021.
States Receiving Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) payments, 1995-2021
| Rank | State | Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) 1995-2021 | Pct of Total | Running Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | South Dakota | $135,272,753 | 22.0% | 22.0% |
| 2 | Nebraska | $47,649,608 | 7.8% | 29.8% |
| 3 | North Dakota | $47,320,103 | 7.7% | 37.5% |
| 4 | Texas | $38,779,421 | 6.3% | 43.8% |
| 5 | Kentucky | $38,775,730 | 6.3% | 50.1% |
| 6 | California | $36,250,620 | 5.9% | 56.0% |
| 7 | Montana | $31,836,325 | 5.2% | 61.2% |
| 8 | Kansas | $26,726,050 | 4.3% | 65.5% |
| 9 | Louisiana | $24,708,772 | 4.0% | 69.5% |
| 10 | New Mexico | $19,362,861 | 3.2% | 72.7% |
| 11 | Iowa | $17,725,472 | 2.9% | 75.6% |
| 12 | Oklahoma | $15,676,903 | 2.6% | 78.1% |
| 13 | Minnesota | $14,022,443 | 2.3% | 80.4% |
| 14 | Wyoming | $11,555,047 | 1.9% | 82.3% |
| 15 | Arkansas | $11,519,321 | 1.9% | 84.1% |
| 16 | Colorado | $11,225,807 | 1.8% | 86.0% |
| 17 | Washington | $9,026,750 | 1.5% | 87.4% |
| 18 | Missouri | $8,040,080 | 1.3% | 88.7% |
| 19 | North Carolina | $6,106,528 | 1.0% | 89.7% |
| 20 | Oregon | $6,071,073 | 1.0% | 90.7% |
| 21 | Puerto Rico | $5,548,614 | 0.9% | 91.6% |
| 22 | Idaho | $5,034,442 | 0.8% | 92.4% |
| 23 | Virginia | $4,863,038 | 0.8% | 93.2% |
| 24 | Mississippi | $4,714,223 | 0.8% | 94.0% |
| 25 | Utah | $3,820,991 | 0.6% | 94.6% |
| 26 | West Virginia | $3,789,738 | 0.6% | 95.2% |
| 27 | Alabama | $3,602,754 | 0.6% | 95.8% |
| 28 | Tennessee | $3,560,001 | 0.6% | 96.4% |
| 29 | Wisconsin | $3,392,150 | 0.6% | 97.0% |
| 30 | Indiana | $3,215,119 | 0.5% | 97.5% |
| 31 | Florida | $2,579,654 | 0.4% | 97.9% |
| 32 | Georgia | $2,578,268 | 0.4% | 98.3% |
| 33 | Ohio | $1,655,747 | 0.3% | 98.6% |
| 34 | Michigan | $1,597,381 | 0.3% | 98.9% |
| 35 | Illinois | $1,411,820 | 0.2% | 99.1% |
| 36 | New York | $1,074,997 | 0.2% | 99.3% |
| 37 | South Carolina | $923,767 | 0.2% | 99.4% |
| 38 | Hawaii | $735,419 | 0.1% | 99.5% |
| 39 | Pennsylvania | $732,999 | 0.1% | 99.6% |
| 40 | Nevada | $591,076 | 0.1% | 99.7% |
| 41 | US Virgin Islands | $404,660 | 0.1% | 99.8% |
| 42 | Maryland | $268,158 | 0.0% | 99.9% |
| 43 | New Jersey | $233,805 | 0.0% | 99.9% |
| 44 | Alaska | $230,836 | 0.0% | 99.9% |
| 45 | Vermont | $123,901 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 46 | Delaware | $77,420 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 47 | Connecticut | $75,934 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 48 | Maine | $65,096 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 49 | Massachusetts | $40,075 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 50 | Arizona | $28,297 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 51 | Rhode Island | $10,648 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 52 | New Hampshire | $9,223 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
Source: Environmental Working Group. Compiled from USDA data.
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf