Dairy Programs payments in 2nd District of New Jersey (Rep. Jefferson Van Drew) totaled $2.9 million from 1995-2021.
States Receiving Dairy Programs payments, 1995-2021
| Rank | State | Dairy Programs 1995-2021 | Pct of Total | Running Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wisconsin | $1,316,278,923 | 21.2% | 21.2% |
| 2 | California | $578,176,949 | 9.3% | 30.5% |
| 3 | New York | $555,467,732 | 8.9% | 39.4% |
| 4 | Minnesota | $509,128,619 | 8.2% | 47.6% |
| 5 | Pennsylvania | $505,705,702 | 8.1% | 55.7% |
| 6 | Michigan | $277,862,332 | 4.5% | 60.2% |
| 7 | Ohio | $229,704,753 | 3.7% | 63.9% |
| 8 | Iowa | $215,249,742 | 3.5% | 67.4% |
| 9 | Texas | $164,447,058 | 2.6% | 70.0% |
| 10 | Vermont | $135,307,363 | 2.2% | 72.2% |
| 11 | Idaho | $129,526,694 | 2.1% | 74.3% |
| 12 | Washington | $119,112,320 | 1.9% | 76.2% |
| 13 | Illinois | $113,550,556 | 1.8% | 78.0% |
| 14 | Missouri | $100,860,137 | 1.6% | 79.6% |
| 15 | Virginia | $95,675,600 | 1.5% | 81.2% |
| 16 | Indiana | $94,852,215 | 1.5% | 82.7% |
| 17 | Kentucky | $79,090,752 | 1.3% | 84.0% |
| 18 | New Mexico | $66,159,718 | 1.1% | 85.0% |
| 19 | Oregon | $63,046,628 | 1.0% | 86.1% |
| 20 | Tennessee | $61,977,596 | 1.0% | 87.1% |
| 21 | South Dakota | $60,231,113 | 1.0% | 88.0% |
| 22 | Maryland | $58,391,632 | 0.9% | 89.0% |
| 23 | Utah | $56,005,746 | 0.9% | 89.9% |
| 24 | Georgia | $51,961,140 | 0.8% | 90.7% |
| 25 | Kansas | $50,256,748 | 0.8% | 91.5% |
| 26 | North Carolina | $46,601,186 | 0.7% | 92.3% |
| 27 | Nebraska | $42,095,868 | 0.7% | 92.9% |
| 28 | Colorado | $40,372,931 | 0.6% | 93.6% |
| 29 | Florida | $36,788,308 | 0.6% | 94.2% |
| 30 | Maine | $35,644,754 | 0.6% | 94.7% |
| 31 | Puerto Rico | $34,767,373 | 0.6% | 95.3% |
| 32 | Arizona | $33,759,174 | 0.5% | 95.9% |
| 33 | Oklahoma | $32,755,605 | 0.5% | 96.4% |
| 34 | Louisiana | $26,067,578 | 0.4% | 96.8% |
| 35 | North Dakota | $22,042,093 | 0.4% | 97.2% |
| 36 | Mississippi | $20,314,231 | 0.3% | 97.5% |
| 37 | Massachusetts | $20,301,149 | 0.3% | 97.8% |
| 38 | Connecticut | $19,722,265 | 0.3% | 98.1% |
| 39 | Montana | $17,546,927 | 0.3% | 98.4% |
| 40 | Arkansas | $16,351,752 | 0.3% | 98.7% |
| 41 | New Hampshire | $16,078,906 | 0.3% | 98.9% |
| 42 | South Carolina | $15,332,547 | 0.2% | 99.2% |
| 43 | New Jersey | $10,782,360 | 0.2% | 99.3% |
| 44 | Alabama | $10,239,494 | 0.2% | 99.5% |
| 45 | West Virginia | $10,024,739 | 0.2% | 99.7% |
| 46 | Nevada | $9,289,337 | 0.1% | 99.8% |
| 47 | Delaware | $5,400,941 | 0.1% | 99.9% |
| 48 | Wyoming | $2,909,950 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 49 | Rhode Island | $1,188,539 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 50 | Hawaii | $977,232 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 51 | Alaska | $601,501 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
Source: Environmental Working Group. Compiled from USDA data.
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf