Conservation Reserve Program in the United States, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 317,226
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in the United States totaled $1,823,000,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | , | $250,000 | |
22 | , | $248,776 | |
23 | Phillips Jv | Harrington, WA 99134 | $244,360 |
24 | Grimm-davis Farms | Chesterfield, MO 63005 | $243,630 |
25 | Bdr Land LLC | Livermore, IA 50558 | $241,333 |
26 | Bryant Agricultural Enterprise | Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 | $237,752 |
27 | Lang-mour Joint Venture | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $235,980 |
28 | Insanity Acres | Delta Junction, AK 99737 | $229,627 |
29 | Rtp Land Co LLC | Fort Lupton, CO 80621 | $224,979 |
30 | Dale Farming Company | Ridgeway, MO 64481 | $224,498 |
31 | Broughton Land Co | Dayton, WA 99328 | $217,944 |
32 | Community First Bank ** | Kennewick, WA 99336 | $211,717 |
33 | Alpine Five | Burlington, CO 80807 | $210,700 |
34 | Nelson 7ud Ranches | Rockland, ID 83271 | $203,103 |
35 | Ready Farming Partnership | Bethany, MO 64424 | $202,143 |
36 | Cook Farms General Partnership | Princeton, KY 42445 | $200,000 |
37 | Eastern Oregon Investment Management | La Grande, OR 97850 | $200,000 |
38 | The Berg Partnership | Paterson, WA 99345 | $199,205 |
39 | Plum Nature Association | Altheimer, AR 72004 | $189,784 |
40 | Nolin Farming Company | Pendleton, OR 97801 | $189,007 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”