Conservation Reserve Program in the United States, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 322,301
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in the United States totaled $1,702,000,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Cms Partners | Alden, IA 50006 | $201,468 |
42 | Farm Credit Of New Mexico ** | Tucumcari, NM 88401 | $200,679 |
43 | Cook Farms General Partnership | Princeton, KY 42445 | $200,000 |
44 | Eastern Oregon Investment Management | La Grande, OR 97850 | $200,000 |
45 | Community Bank ** | Pendleton, OR 97801 | $197,238 |
46 | Nolin Farming Company | Pendleton, OR 97801 | $195,820 |
47 | Fnr-connor Partnership | Lamesa, TX 79331 | $193,999 |
48 | The Berg Partnership | Paterson, WA 99345 | $193,856 |
49 | Ctuir | Pendleton, OR 97801 | $192,861 |
50 | Sac & Fox Tribe Of The Mississippi In Iowa | Ames, IA 50010 | $191,759 |
51 | Plum Nature Association | Altheimer, AR 72004 | $189,784 |
52 | Spratling Farms | Burley, ID 83318 | $188,724 |
53 | Jmb Family Farms | Bethune, CO 80805 | $187,904 |
54 | Minnwest Bank ** | Marshall, MN 56258 | $183,030 |
55 | Evans Brothers Farm | Arbon, ID 83212 | $180,840 |
56 | Carter Farms | Maury City, TN 38050 | $175,868 |
57 | Fish Family Farmers | Minnetonka, MN 55305 | $172,080 |
58 | Cline Clyde Ranch | Vancouver, WA 98687 | $170,770 |
59 | H M Ranch | Heppner, OR 97836 | $169,128 |
60 | H-4 Farms Partnership | Kahlotus, WA 99335 | $168,176 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”