Conservation Reserve Program in the United States, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 317,226
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in the United States totaled $1,823,000,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Allendale Planting Co | Shelby, MS 38774 | $186,940 |
42 | Mark A Cottingim | Camden, OH 45311 | $183,128 |
43 | Whispering Winds Farms | Hopkinsville, KY 42241 | $180,434 |
44 | Carter Farms | Maury City, TN 38050 | $180,284 |
45 | Ctuir | Pendleton, OR 97801 | $180,072 |
46 | , | $178,759 | |
47 | United Bank Of Iowa ** | Carroll, IA 51401 | $178,469 |
48 | Schmechel Farming Partnership | Helena, MT 59601 | $177,164 |
49 | Lower Brule Sioux Tribe | Lower Brule, SD 57548 | $174,564 |
50 | Cms Partners | Alden, IA 50006 | $174,542 |
51 | Kyle Matthews | American Falls, ID 83211 | $172,882 |
52 | Fish Family Farmers | Minnetonka, MN 55305 | $172,080 |
53 | Iowa Family Farms | Batavia, IA 52533 | $172,034 |
54 | Cline Clyde Ranch | Vancouver, WA 98687 | $170,770 |
55 | Farm Credit Of Southern Colorado ** | Lamar, CO 81052 | $169,952 |
56 | H M Ranch | Heppner, OR 97836 | $169,488 |
57 | Kuhlman & Sons Operating Acct | Canyon, TX 79015 | $168,580 |
58 | Hippen Paradise Acres | Aplington, IA 50604 | $166,695 |
59 | Evans Brothers Farm | Arbon, ID 83212 | $165,616 |
60 | Burning Butterfly Partnership | Boise, ID 83702 | $165,354 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”