Market Gains in the United States, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 240,701
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in the United States totaled $5,351,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Fontenot And Fontenot | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $1,454,520 |
42 | Rubenacker Farms | Dahlgren, IL 62828 | $1,450,140 |
43 | Sjv Enterprises | Nicolaus, CA 95659 | $1,400,889 |
44 | Buckeye Farms | Como, MS 38619 | $1,397,846 |
45 | Arnold Hoffart Mark Hoffart & Nei | Robbins, CA 95676 | $1,390,934 |
46 | J & R Farming | Grimes, CA 95950 | $1,390,841 |
47 | Morgan Farms | Rector, AR 72461 | $1,389,633 |
48 | R A Pickens And Son Company | Pickens, AR 71662 | $1,384,811 |
49 | Berry Farm Enterprises | Robinsonville, MS 38664 | $1,362,222 |
50 | Tackett Farms | Schlater, MS 38952 | $1,356,928 |
51 | E Franklin Larrabee & Assoc | Chico, CA 95926 | $1,341,491 |
52 | Hughes Farming A Tenn Partnership | Brownsville, TN 38012 | $1,337,402 |
53 | Fullen Ag Company | Ripley, TN 38063 | $1,286,791 |
54 | Benwood Farms | Earle, AR 72331 | $1,280,882 |
55 | Chrisman Farms | Williams, CA 95987 | $1,271,114 |
56 | Robinson Farms | Dexter, MO 63841 | $1,263,009 |
57 | Meyer-baynon | Biggs, CA 95917 | $1,254,783 |
58 | K & R Farming | Fort Bragg, CA 95437 | $1,245,719 |
59 | Twin Lakes | Parkin, AR 72373 | $1,231,470 |
60 | Triple A Farming Co | Eagle Lake, TX 77434 | $1,216,964 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”