Market Gains in the United States, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 240,701
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in the United States totaled $5,351,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Edward Schafer & Sons | Carlisle, AR 72024 | $1,094,949 |
82 | Bbg Farms | Pocahontas, AR 72455 | $1,091,724 |
83 | White Farms Ajv | Marks, MS 38646 | $1,091,151 |
84 | T & P Farms | Steele, MO 63877 | $1,083,835 |
85 | Three B Farms Partnership | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $1,082,896 |
86 | Couch Farms | Jackson, TN 38301 | $1,080,647 |
87 | Rizzo Farms Joint Venture | Cleveland, MS 38732 | $1,078,542 |
88 | Penndale Farms Partnership | Wynne, AR 72396 | $1,077,913 |
89 | Triple Creek Farms Partnership | Harrisburg, AR 72432 | $1,077,358 |
90 | Romero Farms Partnership | Dalhart, TX 79022 | $1,072,805 |
91 | Gypsy Farms | Greenville, MS 38703 | $1,062,141 |
92 | Knight Farms | Glenn, CA 95943 | $1,060,390 |
93 | Bobby David Lowrey Farms | Parma, MO 63870 | $1,060,047 |
94 | Lakeview Farms | Jonesboro, AR 72404 | $1,057,594 |
95 | Gant & Sons Farms Joint Venture | Merigold, MS 38759 | $1,054,800 |
96 | Joe Woolverton Farms | Gideon, MO 63848 | $1,053,203 |
97 | Parker & Jones Farms | Senath, MO 63876 | $1,043,253 |
98 | Campbell Farms | Cooter, MO 63839 | $1,041,063 |
99 | Franklin Partnership | Rayville, LA 71269 | $1,012,319 |
100 | Bruton Farms Partnership | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $1,006,139 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”