Environmental Quality Incentives Program in the United States, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 115,498
Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in the United States totaled $944,006,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Environmental Quality Incentives Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Passamaquoddy Joint Tribal Counci | Princeton, ME 04668 | $181,714 |
82 | Briard's Hog Farm Partnership | Frazee, MN 56544 | $178,956 |
83 | Lloyd Walker | Altonah, UT 84002 | $178,183 |
84 | Daniel E Bishop | Goldsboro, MD 21636 | $177,497 |
85 | Dean Klein | Lake City, MN 55041 | $176,964 |
86 | Fond Du Lac Res Business Comm | Cloquet, MN 55720 | $176,342 |
87 | Wright Place LLC | Clinton, ME 04927 | $175,443 |
88 | Bill C Lindsey | Rankin, TX 79778 | $174,942 |
89 | Lower Brule Sioux Tribe | Lower Brule, SD 57548 | $174,510 |
90 | John W Quinn | Brady, TX 76825 | $173,737 |
91 | Max Anderson | South Jordan, UT 84095 | $172,830 |
92 | Robert G Bevis | Scott, AR 72142 | $172,398 |
93 | Joe And Geraldine Burford | Texico, NM 88135 | $171,294 |
94 | Seneca Nation Of Indians | Salamanca, NY 14779 | $171,159 |
95 | Timm Bros Inc | Okanogan, WA 98840 | $169,390 |
96 | Thacker Riverside Dairy | Bluebell, UT 84007 | $169,014 |
97 | Millard E Morris | Paducah, TX 79248 | $168,151 |
98 | H Covert & L Knapton | Piermont, NH 03779 | $167,989 |
99 | Vander Haak Dairy II | Lynden, WA 98264 | $167,981 |
100 | James C Lyman | Tulelake, CA 96134 | $166,756 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”