Environmental Quality Incentives Program in the United States, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 115,498

Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in the United States totaled $944,006,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Environmental Quality Incentives Program
1995-2023
81Passamaquoddy Joint Tribal CounciPrinceton, ME 04668$181,714
82Briard's Hog Farm PartnershipFrazee, MN 56544$178,956
83Lloyd WalkerAltonah, UT 84002$178,183
84Daniel E BishopGoldsboro, MD 21636$177,497
85Dean KleinLake City, MN 55041$176,964
86Fond Du Lac Res Business CommCloquet, MN 55720$176,342
87Wright Place LLCClinton, ME 04927$175,443
88Bill C LindseyRankin, TX 79778$174,942
89Lower Brule Sioux TribeLower Brule, SD 57548$174,510
90John W QuinnBrady, TX 76825$173,737
91Max AndersonSouth Jordan, UT 84095$172,830
92Robert G BevisScott, AR 72142$172,398
93Joe And Geraldine BurfordTexico, NM 88135$171,294
94Seneca Nation Of IndiansSalamanca, NY 14779$171,159
95Timm Bros IncOkanogan, WA 98840$169,390
96Thacker Riverside DairyBluebell, UT 84007$169,014
97Millard E MorrisPaducah, TX 79248$168,151
98H Covert & L KnaptonPiermont, NH 03779$167,989
99Vander Haak Dairy IILynden, WA 98264$167,981
100James C LymanTulelake, CA 96134$166,756

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag