SELECT * FROM na_mtotal WHERE fips='00000' AND progcode='totaleqip ' AND `rank`>=1 LIMIT 0,20

Env. Quality Incentive Program in the United States, 1995-2020‡

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 279,783

Recipients of Env. Quality Incentive Program from farms in the United States totaled $4,236,000,000 in from 1995-2020‡.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Env. Quality Incentive Program
1Prickly Pear Simmental Ranch Llp *Helena, MT 59602$2,934,835
2Shaan SeetCraig, AK 99921$2,489,059
3Diversified Fin Serv LLCOmaha, NE 68154$2,141,263
4Diversified FinancialOmaha, NE 68154$1,756,430
5Marysville Irrigation CoAshton, ID 83420$1,743,179
6Scott FarmsPryor, MT 59066$1,667,960
7Goodman Dairy Farm LLCPortland, MI 48875$1,608,151
8Bedortha Ranches Inc *Paulina, OR 97751$1,547,358
9Frank S PriceSterling City, TX 76951$1,514,750
10ScidSnowflake, AZ 85937$1,437,489
11Salt River Pima Maricopa Indian C *Scottsdale, AZ 85250$1,426,235
12Sherrel D WardCleveland, UT 84518$1,234,869
13White Mountain Apache Tribe *Whiteriver, AZ 85941$1,081,181
14Kevin R LandryRayne, LA 70578$1,039,152
15Riata Farms *Queen Creek, AZ 85142$984,843
16T-l Credit CompanyHastings, NE 68902$962,853
17Ute Mountain Ute Farm & Ranch Ent *Towaoc, CO 81334$897,816
18Mark BeboLingle, WY 82223$823,399
19IfaSalt Lake City, UT 84130$777,671
20HcicHuntington, UT 84528$756,339

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

‡ Data for 2020 includes payments made by USDA through June 30, 2020 and does not include crop insurance premium subsidies.


Farm Subsidies Education