Conservation Reserve Program in the United States, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 322,301
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in the United States totaled $1,702,000,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Miller Ranch | Harlowton, MT 59036 | $135,244 |
102 | Compeer Financial ** | Fulda, MN 56131 | $134,242 |
103 | First National Bank ** | Correctionville, IA 51016 | $132,260 |
104 | Whatley's Four Oaks Partnership | Denham Springs, LA 70726 | $131,956 |
105 | C J Farms Gen Ptnr | Holdrege, NE 68949 | $130,684 |
106 | Birdlands Partnership | Memphis, TN 38119 | $129,438 |
107 | Ricketts So Il Gp | Fairfield, IL 62837 | $128,250 |
108 | B & B Farms | Kennewick, WA 99336 | $127,636 |
109 | K&h Farms | Briggsdale, CO 80611 | $127,442 |
110 | Southern Agricultural Credit Corp ** | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $126,284 |
111 | B & T Farms | Prosser, WA 99350 | $125,628 |
112 | Rafter Zee Ranches | Ione, OR 97843 | $125,529 |
113 | Wiswall Ag Partnership | Pasco, WA 99301 | $124,145 |
114 | Bjornstad-east Farm Jv | Walhalla, ND 58282 | $123,009 |
115 | Galbreath Brothers Jv | Ritzville, WA 99169 | $123,005 |
116 | Humphrey Farms | Lexington, MS 39095 | $122,032 |
117 | L Y 7 Company | Santa Margarita, CA 93453 | $121,997 |
118 | Bank Of Eastern Oregon ** | Heppner, OR 97836 | $121,743 |
119 | Aspen Partnership | Durkee, OR 97905 | $121,411 |
120 | Suncure Farms | Burlington, CO 80807 | $120,608 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”