Market Gains in the United States, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 240,701
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in the United States totaled $5,351,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Carranza Farms | Stanfield, AZ 85272 | $896,734 |
122 | Manning Farms | Halls, TN 38040 | $894,944 |
123 | Arroya Farms | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $891,411 |
124 | Heartland Farms | Dexter, MO 63841 | $889,491 |
125 | Anson Farms | Vincennes, IN 47591 | $889,144 |
126 | Wilkins Farms | Kennett, MO 63857 | $888,530 |
127 | Strain And Strain | Arbuckle, CA 95912 | $885,587 |
128 | Moon Lake Farms | Clarksdale, MS 38614 | $885,578 |
129 | Trail Partnership | Widener, AR 72394 | $881,291 |
130 | Renaud Ranch | Willows, CA 95988 | $879,289 |
131 | Beaird Farms | Halls, TN 38040 | $875,283 |
132 | Henning Rice Farms | Orland, CA 95963 | $874,114 |
133 | A G Taylor And Sons | Wynne, AR 72396 | $873,705 |
134 | Lindsey Bros Partnership | Forrest City, AR 72335 | $865,127 |
135 | Wabash Farms | Helena, AR 72342 | $864,097 |
136 | Drozd Farms | Allegan, MI 49010 | $861,382 |
137 | Hansen Ranches | Corcoran, CA 93212 | $861,252 |
138 | Adron Farms | Minter City, MS 38944 | $860,733 |
139 | Rkb Farms Partnership | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $859,189 |
140 | Wilson Bend Farms | Knights Landing, CA 94645 | $854,097 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”