Environmental Quality Incentives Program in the United States, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 115,498

Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in the United States totaled $944,006,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Environmental Quality Incentives Program
1995-2023
121Scenic View Dairy LLCHolland, MI 49423$156,000
122Deer Flats Farm, LLCWest Pawlet, VT 05775$155,952
123Mary K HigginsClayton, NM 88415$153,665
124Chad A KoehnCochise, AZ 85606$152,130
125Anthonys DairyAmericus, GA 31719$151,947
126Vanderhyde Dairy IncChatham, VA 24531$151,937
127Steve A PokornyLander, WY 82520$151,767
128Patrick X TraskElm Springs, SD 57791$151,293
129Thunder Ranch LLCJensen, UT 84035$150,386
130Hen Co HogsBiggsville, IL 61418$150,023
131Mulligan Farm IncAvon, NY 14414$148,750
132Joe DonohueGreeley, KS 66033$148,548
133Jerry DippleDublin, TX 76446$147,676
134Frank H And Marcella BlackburnClovis, NM 88101$147,654
135Richard A AitkenMonroe, ME 04951$147,597
136Robert M QuintanaLas Vegas, NM 87701$146,530
137Gerard TheriaultSaint Agatha, ME 04772$146,204
138Big Trout Properties Lp Dba RockiPhilipsburg, MT 59858$146,170
139Tim J CarrollAltamont, UT 84001$144,609
140Dyers Valley Farm IncNewcastle, ME 04553$144,023

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag