Conservation Reserve Program in the United States, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 322,301
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in the United States totaled $1,702,000,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Terry & Druscilla Hutton Farms Joint Venture | Lubbock, TX 79424 | $105,220 |
142 | Justesen Brothers | Tygh Valley, OR 97063 | $105,007 |
143 | A J M Farms | Duncombe, IA 50532 | $104,923 |
144 | Hampton Hills Investment Group | Temecula, CA 92591 | $104,376 |
145 | Simmons Brothers Partners | Idaho Falls, ID 83401 | $103,646 |
146 | First Missouri Bank ** | Brookfield, MO 64628 | $103,637 |
147 | Clawson Ranch Partnership | Plains, KS 67869 | $103,031 |
148 | Hardie Family General Partnership | Redmond, OR 97756 | $102,869 |
149 | Leahy Grain Inc | Cuba City, WI 53807 | $102,831 |
150 | Idaho Agcredit Pca ** | American Falls, ID 83211 | $102,509 |
151 | Lumpp Family Farms Gp | Tallula, IL 62688 | $102,464 |
152 | Bonaire Partnership | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $102,327 |
153 | Bromiley Brothers Ranch | East Wenatchee, WA 98802 | $102,285 |
154 | J S Burres And Sons | Condon, OR 97823 | $102,037 |
155 | Stangel Industries & Machine Shop Partnership | Enterprise, OR 97828 | $102,019 |
156 | Happy State Bank ** | Dumas, TX 79029 | $101,996 |
157 | Ralph Johnson Farms | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $101,128 |
158 | North Shore Four Investments | San Diego, CA 92106 | $101,116 |
159 | Kent Farms Partnership | Tipton, KS 67485 | $100,840 |
160 | Kunau Land Co | Burley, ID 83318 | $100,295 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”