Market Gains in the United States, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 240,701
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in the United States totaled $5,351,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Colorado River Indian Tribes Farm | Parker, AZ 85344 | $851,567 |
142 | P G C Farms | Brinson, GA 39825 | $851,070 |
143 | Styck & Sons | Morocco, IN 47963 | $848,624 |
144 | Maben Farms | Willows, CA 95988 | $844,623 |
145 | Larry Hansen Farms | Princeton, CA 95970 | $839,689 |
146 | Von Allman Farms | Firebaugh, CA 93622 | $838,109 |
147 | Wren Farm Joint Venture | Pocahontas, AR 72455 | $835,755 |
148 | Little Thailand Farms II | Nesbit, MS 38651 | $832,758 |
149 | Hunter Farms | Jefferson, IA 50129 | $832,176 |
150 | Driskell Cotton Farms | Grand Bay, AL 36541 | $828,541 |
151 | Lundberg/lundberg | Richvale, CA 95974 | $826,742 |
152 | John M Mobley & Sons | Moultrie, GA 31776 | $824,713 |
153 | Knowles Ranch | Durham, CA 95938 | $823,527 |
154 | Dabb Farms | Caraway, AR 72419 | $816,626 |
155 | Keller And Keller Partnership | Colusa, CA 95932 | $811,760 |
156 | Farmers Farm | Osceola, AR 72370 | $811,170 |
157 | 6 River Farms | Live Oak, CA 95953 | $807,705 |
158 | Rayner Planting Co | Merigold, MS 38759 | $806,437 |
159 | G C Farms Partnership | Augusta, AR 72006 | $806,348 |
160 | King Ranch Inc | Kingsville, TX 78364 | $803,646 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”