Environmental Quality Incentives Program in the United States, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 115,498
Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in the United States totaled $944,006,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Environmental Quality Incentives Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Alan R Barnes Rev Living Trust | Middletown, MO 63359 | $143,975 |
142 | Arnco Farms Inc | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $142,924 |
143 | Mesa Verde Ranch Llp | Alamogordo, NM 88311 | $142,322 |
144 | Summit Creek Ranch LLC | Hayfork, CA 96041 | $142,172 |
145 | Horse Creek Farms | Springfield, CO 81073 | $141,803 |
146 | Saddle Mtn Ranch | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $141,375 |
147 | Tangle Cross Trust | Deming, NM 88031 | $140,542 |
148 | Minton Ag Co | Dexter, MO 63841 | $140,503 |
149 | Hubbell & Hubbell Inc | Spearville, KS 67876 | $140,470 |
150 | Rodney Baley | Tulelake, CA 96134 | $140,391 |
151 | Donald Farms | Woodland, WA 98674 | $140,351 |
152 | Carroll Caron | Fort Kent, ME 04743 | $140,314 |
153 | W C Williams | Mertzon, TX 76941 | $140,222 |
154 | Hanchek Bros | Wilson, MI 49896 | $139,969 |
155 | John J Mcmordie Estate | Vernon, TX 76384 | $139,406 |
156 | Mckoen & Son | Merrill, OR 97633 | $138,795 |
157 | Cory J Gagnon | Fort Kent Mills, ME 04744 | $138,400 |
158 | Lac Courte Oreilles Tribal Gov | Hayward, WI 54843 | $137,753 |
159 | Nelson Family Trust | Wilton, CA 95693 | $137,751 |
160 | Arneson Ranch Inc | Meadow, SD 57644 | $137,498 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”