Environmental Quality Incentives Program in the United States, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 115,498

Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in the United States totaled $944,006,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Environmental Quality Incentives Program
1995-2023
141Alan R Barnes Rev Living TrustMiddletown, MO 63359$143,975
142Arnco Farms IncSikeston, MO 63801$142,924
143Mesa Verde Ranch LlpAlamogordo, NM 88311$142,322
144Summit Creek Ranch LLCHayfork, CA 96041$142,172
145Horse Creek FarmsSpringfield, CO 81073$141,803
146Saddle Mtn RanchBuckeye, AZ 85326$141,375
147Tangle Cross TrustDeming, NM 88031$140,542
148Minton Ag CoDexter, MO 63841$140,503
149Hubbell & Hubbell IncSpearville, KS 67876$140,470
150Rodney BaleyTulelake, CA 96134$140,391
151Donald FarmsWoodland, WA 98674$140,351
152Carroll CaronFort Kent, ME 04743$140,314
153W C WilliamsMertzon, TX 76941$140,222
154Hanchek BrosWilson, MI 49896$139,969
155John J Mcmordie EstateVernon, TX 76384$139,406
156Mckoen & SonMerrill, OR 97633$138,795
157Cory J GagnonFort Kent Mills, ME 04744$138,400
158Lac Courte Oreilles Tribal GovHayward, WI 54843$137,753
159Nelson Family TrustWilton, CA 95693$137,751
160Arneson Ranch IncMeadow, SD 57644$137,498

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag