Environmental Quality Incentives Program in the United States, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 115,498
Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in the United States totaled $944,006,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Environmental Quality Incentives Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Hegeman Farm | Cosby, MO 64436 | $137,364 |
162 | Gerald G Scanlan | Malin, OR 97632 | $136,898 |
163 | Martin Woods Dba Gone Organic Dai | Hico, TX 76457 | $135,925 |
164 | Yon Family Farms Inc | Ridge Spring, SC 29129 | $135,915 |
165 | Charles A Hafdell | Fort Sumner, NM 88119 | $135,731 |
166 | Frank F Diaz | Tulelake, CA 96134 | $134,922 |
167 | Gerald D Mathis | Elida, NM 88116 | $134,773 |
168 | Michael J Olsyn III | Columbia Cross Roads, PA 16914 | $134,698 |
169 | Steven Howard Shropshire | Hilo, HI 96721 | $134,685 |
170 | Myrin Ranch Inc | Altamont, UT 84001 | $134,566 |
171 | Calvin Wayne Waters | Fruita, CO 81521 | $134,219 |
172 | John Bullinger & Sons | Basin, WY 82410 | $134,172 |
173 | Peebles Farms | Gable, SC 29051 | $133,462 |
174 | Russell Peterson | Klamath Falls, OR 97603 | $132,787 |
175 | Steve Rosbach | Ellensburg, WA 98926 | $132,728 |
176 | Matt & Dorothy Rogers | Clinton, ME 04927 | $132,583 |
177 | Rodney D Wubbena | Belvidere, IL 61008 | $132,300 |
178 | Ernest E Hawes | Albion, ME 04910 | $132,122 |
179 | Harrison Neblett Thomas | Harrisburg, AR 72432 | $131,784 |
180 | Yankton Land & Cattle Company | Yankton, SD 57078 | $131,715 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”