Environmental Quality Incentives Program in the United States, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 115,498

Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in the United States totaled $944,006,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Environmental Quality Incentives Program
1995-2023
161Hegeman FarmCosby, MO 64436$137,364
162Gerald G ScanlanMalin, OR 97632$136,898
163Martin Woods Dba Gone Organic DaiHico, TX 76457$135,925
164Yon Family Farms IncRidge Spring, SC 29129$135,915
165Charles A HafdellFort Sumner, NM 88119$135,731
166Frank F DiazTulelake, CA 96134$134,922
167Gerald D MathisElida, NM 88116$134,773
168Michael J Olsyn IIIColumbia Cross Roads, PA 16914$134,698
169Steven Howard ShropshireHilo, HI 96721$134,685
170Myrin Ranch IncAltamont, UT 84001$134,566
171Calvin Wayne WatersFruita, CO 81521$134,219
172John Bullinger & SonsBasin, WY 82410$134,172
173Peebles FarmsGable, SC 29051$133,462
174Russell PetersonKlamath Falls, OR 97603$132,787
175Steve RosbachEllensburg, WA 98926$132,728
176Matt & Dorothy RogersClinton, ME 04927$132,583
177Rodney D WubbenaBelvidere, IL 61008$132,300
178Ernest E HawesAlbion, ME 04910$132,122
179Harrison Neblett ThomasHarrisburg, AR 72432$131,784
180Yankton Land & Cattle CompanyYankton, SD 57078$131,715

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag