Commodity Certificates in the United States, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 55,649

Recipients of Commodity Certificates from farms in the United States totaled $6,967,000,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Commodity Certificates
1995-2023
61Ak-chin FarmsMaricopa, AZ 85138$2,840,258
62E W Merritt FarmsPorterville, CA 93257$2,835,066
63Limerick FarmsTunica, MS 38676$2,833,365
64Associated Farming 92Mesa, AZ 85213$2,832,768
65Bailey CompanyMadison, MS 39110$2,823,177
66Colorado River Indian Tribes FarmParker, AZ 85344$2,787,439
67Makamson Planting CoMorgan City, MS 38946$2,767,526
68Harper Ross FarmsLeland, MS 38756$2,763,714
69Parker Brothers FarmSikeston, MO 63801$2,762,545
70Kelley & Kelley Farms PartnershipBurlison, TN 38015$2,758,414
71J E Wray & Sons PartnersTrumann, AR 72472$2,744,223
72Koda Farms IncSouth Dos Palos, CA 93665$2,738,460
73Parker & Jones FarmsSenath, MO 63876$2,720,588
74West Company PartnershipNashville, TN 37215$2,706,980
75George Watte & SonsTulare, CA 93274$2,700,313
76Robbins Farms IncAltus, OK 73521$2,683,295
77Parks Place PlantationShelby, MS 38774$2,650,372
78Marsh FarmsTallulah, LA 71282$2,646,560
79Hughes Farming A Tenn PartnershipBrownsville, TN 38012$2,638,617
80Quofaloma PartnersFlora, MS 39071$2,630,288

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag