Commodity Certificates in the United States, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 55,649
Recipients of Commodity Certificates from farms in the United States totaled $6,967,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Commodity Certificates 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Ak-chin Farms | Maricopa, AZ 85138 | $2,840,258 |
62 | E W Merritt Farms | Porterville, CA 93257 | $2,835,066 |
63 | Limerick Farms | Tunica, MS 38676 | $2,833,365 |
64 | Associated Farming 92 | Mesa, AZ 85213 | $2,832,768 |
65 | Bailey Company | Madison, MS 39110 | $2,823,177 |
66 | Colorado River Indian Tribes Farm | Parker, AZ 85344 | $2,787,439 |
67 | Makamson Planting Co | Morgan City, MS 38946 | $2,767,526 |
68 | Harper Ross Farms | Leland, MS 38756 | $2,763,714 |
69 | Parker Brothers Farm | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $2,762,545 |
70 | Kelley & Kelley Farms Partnership | Burlison, TN 38015 | $2,758,414 |
71 | J E Wray & Sons Partners | Trumann, AR 72472 | $2,744,223 |
72 | Koda Farms Inc | South Dos Palos, CA 93665 | $2,738,460 |
73 | Parker & Jones Farms | Senath, MO 63876 | $2,720,588 |
74 | West Company Partnership | Nashville, TN 37215 | $2,706,980 |
75 | George Watte & Sons | Tulare, CA 93274 | $2,700,313 |
76 | Robbins Farms Inc | Altus, OK 73521 | $2,683,295 |
77 | Parks Place Plantation | Shelby, MS 38774 | $2,650,372 |
78 | Marsh Farms | Tallulah, LA 71282 | $2,646,560 |
79 | Hughes Farming A Tenn Partnership | Brownsville, TN 38012 | $2,638,617 |
80 | Quofaloma Partners | Flora, MS 39071 | $2,630,288 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”