Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs in the United States, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 353
Recipients of Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs from farms in the United States totaled $45,431,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wakefield Pork Inc | Gaylord, MN 55334 | $3,632,244 |
| 2 | Platte Center West LLC | Columbus, NE 68601 | $2,093,352 |
| 3 | Eichelberger Farms Inc | Wayland, IA 52654 | $1,904,062 |
| 4 | Rodrigo M Duarte | Newark, NJ 07105 | $1,189,042 |
| 5 | Kbq Inc | Mountain Lake, MN 56159 | $1,100,135 |
| 6 | Titan Swine | Ireton, IA 51027 | $982,758 |
| 7 | Nordak Llp | Audubon, IA 50025 | $937,255 |
| 8 | Hugoson Pork Inc | Granada, MN 56039 | $903,146 |
| 9 | High Power Pork LLC | Carthage, IL 62321 | $781,837 |
| 10 | Pine Valley Ranch LLC | Spencerville, OH 45887 | $773,452 |
| 11 | D2k | Boyden, IA 51234 | $732,111 |
| 12 | North Fork Pork LLC | Camp Point, IL 62320 | $639,494 |
| 13 | Eagle Point Farms LLC | Carthage, IL 62321 | $598,178 |
| 14 | Sims Enterprises Inc | Liberty, IL 62347 | $570,823 |
| 15 | Everett Brothers Inc | Oxford, AR 72565 | $540,051 |
| 16 | Wen-mar Farms Inc | West Lafayette, OH 43845 | $540,000 |
| 17 | Long & Hufford Farms Inc | Rossville, IN 46065 | $540,000 |
| 18 | Monke Farms Inc | Litchfield, IL 62056 | $506,891 |
| 19 | Hatteras L.l.c. | Audubon, IA 50025 | $502,376 |
| 20 | Dylbrook Farms LLC | Canistota, SD 57012 | $501,587 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf