Market Gains in the United States, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 240,701
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in the United States totaled $5,351,000,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Farmers Rice Coop | Sacramento, CA 95851 | $56,813,419 |
2 | Producers Rice Mill Inc | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $51,982,835 |
3 | Riceland Foods Inc | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $47,009,109 |
4 | Concordia Allied Producers LLC | Ashburn, GA 31714 | $18,909,885 |
5 | American Peanut Marketing Assoc. | Leary, GA 39862 | $14,843,397 |
6 | Chs Inc | Kindred, ND 58051 | $6,416,540 |
7 | Missouri Delta Farms | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $5,159,953 |
8 | S J R Farming | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $4,383,409 |
9 | Peanut Marketing Loan Services Ll | Stephenville, TX 76401 | $3,650,830 |
10 | Gfa Peanut Association | Camilla, GA 31730 | $3,281,583 |
11 | Tyler Farms | Helena, AR 72342 | $2,708,536 |
12 | V-c Peanut Dma LLC | Franklin, VA 23851 | $2,569,488 |
13 | Bowles Farming Company Inc | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $2,482,360 |
14 | Red River Farms | Blythe, CA 92225 | $2,438,773 |
15 | H E Jordan & Family Farm Partnershp | Gates, TN 38037 | $2,378,919 |
16 | Mitchener Pltg Co | Sumner, MS 38957 | $2,357,428 |
17 | Adams Land Co | Leachville, AR 72438 | $2,151,075 |
18 | Peanut Loan Processing Center | Gorman, TX 76454 | $2,146,231 |
19 | M & M Farm Partnership | Hickory Ridge, AR 72347 | $2,136,029 |
20 | Coleman Farms Ptr | Jonesboro, AR 72404 | $2,034,653 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>