Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in the United States, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 397,979
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in the United States totaled $2,109,000,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $22,900,689 |
| 2 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $18,168,867 |
| 3 | Capital Farm Credit ** | El Campo, TX 77437 | $13,517,813 |
| 4 | Agheritage ** | Brinkley, AR 72021 | $11,522,090 |
| 5 | First South Farm Credit Aca ** | Winnsboro, LA 71295 | $11,501,151 |
| 6 | First State Bank Of Blakely ** | Colquitt, GA 39837 | $9,593,610 |
| 7 | Agtexas Fcs ** | Brownfield, TX 79316 | $8,949,660 |
| 8 | Aggeorgia Farm Credit Aca ** | Ocilla, GA 31774 | $7,682,042 |
| 9 | Ameris Bank ** | Dothan, AL 36303 | $7,111,167 |
| 10 | Southwest Georgia Farm Credit ** | Bainbridge, GA 39817 | $6,513,224 |
| 11 | Lone Star State Bank Of West Texa ** | Lubbock, TX 79424 | $6,457,975 |
| 12 | Agcountry Farm Credit Services ** | Jamestown, ND 58402 | $6,365,201 |
| 13 | Prosperity Bank ** | El Campo, TX 77437 | $6,078,859 |
| 14 | Farm Credit Services Of Nd ** | Dickinson, ND 58601 | $5,924,317 |
| 15 | Simmons 1st National Bank ** | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $5,821,024 |
| 16 | Stockman Bank ** | Conrad, MT 59425 | $5,700,072 |
| 17 | First National Bank ** | Paragould, AR 72451 | $5,570,663 |
| 18 | First United Bank ** | Seagraves, TX 79359 | $5,510,884 |
| 19 | City Bank ** | Lubbock, TX 79408 | $5,490,374 |
| 20 | Independence Bank ** | Havre, MT 59501 | $5,473,928 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf