Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Alabama, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 5,163
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Alabama totaled $63,415,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Ameris Bank ** | Dothan, AL 36303 | $2,098,840 |
2 | First South Farm Credit Aca ** | Winnsboro, LA 71295 | $736,841 |
3 | United Bank Of Atmore ** | Atmore, AL 36504 | $611,308 |
4 | Alabama Ag Credit Aca ** | Monroeville, AL 36461 | $591,049 |
5 | Americana Community Bank ** | Dothan, AL 36301 | $490,077 |
6 | Liikatchka Plantation General Partnership | Eufaula, AL 36027 | $441,038 |
7 | Shipes Farms | Headland, AL 36345 | $441,028 |
8 | Mullek Farms | Robertsdale, AL 36567 | $428,569 |
9 | Driskell Cotton Farms | Grand Bay, AL 36541 | $417,478 |
10 | D C Farms | Samson, AL 36477 | $403,048 |
11 | Petelinski Brothers | Robertsdale, AL 36567 | $393,988 |
12 | Westover Planting Co | Eufaula, AL 36027 | $369,637 |
13 | Friend Bank ** | Slocomb, AL 36375 | $363,948 |
14 | Helton Brothers Farm | Atmore, AL 36504 | $348,632 |
15 | Nutrien Ag Solutions | Spanish Fort, AL 36527 | $342,519 |
16 | Sirmon Farms | Daphne, AL 36526 | $338,260 |
17 | Pitchford Farms | Columbia, AL 36319 | $337,304 |
18 | 4 M Family Farms | Saint Elmo, AL 36568 | $323,396 |
19 | James C And Mary J Parker Farms | Headland, AL 36345 | $320,768 |
20 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $305,453 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>