Farm Subsidy information
Russell County, Alabama
Total Subsidies in Russell County, Alabama, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 122
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Russell County, Alabama totaled $1,641,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Westover Planting Co | Eufaula, AL 36027 | $486,114 |
| 2 | Liikatchka Plantation General Partnership | Eufaula, AL 36027 | $106,035 |
| 3 | Jeremie Redden | Seale, AL 36875 | $79,481 |
| 4 | 22nd State Bank ** | Eufaula, AL 36072 | $75,138 |
| 5 | Levco Timber LLC | Opelika, AL 36804 | $52,875 |
| 6 | Baker Farms | Opelika, AL 36804 | $43,038 |
| 7 | Sunspot Farms LLC | Hurstboro, AL 36860 | $40,006 |
| 8 | Termika Jernigan | Union Springs, AL 36089 | $33,688 |
| 9 | Stanley Durham | Pittsview, AL 36871 | $29,715 |
| 10 | Jls Farms LLC | Eufaula, AL 36027 | $27,548 |
| 11 | B & T Farms Llp | Phenix City, AL 36869 | $27,414 |
| 12 | Jeanette I Torbert | Opelika, AL 36804 | $26,687 |
| 13 | Wylaunee Farms General Partnership | Eufaula, AL 36027 | $23,468 |
| 14 | Harrell's Trucking LLC | Phenix City, AL 36867 | $20,964 |
| 15 | Gene Wesley Cox | Phenix City, AL 36870 | $11,939 |
| 16 | Michael Knight | Seale, AL 36875 | $11,816 |
| 17 | Arrowhead Farms Lllp | Seale, AL 36875 | $11,809 |
| 18 | Lazenby Farms LLC | Auburn, AL 36830 | $9,210 |
| 19 | Broad Acres Plantation | Fort Mitchell, AL 36856 | $7,678 |
| 20 | Matthew T Green | Fort Mitchell, AL 36856 | $7,632 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf