Conservation Reserve Program in Alaska, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 107

Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Alaska totaled $22,463,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Conservation Reserve Program
1Arctic Rose FarmDelta Junction, AK 99737$1,548,856
2Dennis Green & Sons PartnershipDelta Junction, AK 99737$1,374,334
3John M RobinsonDelta Junction, AK 99737$1,098,020
4Sawmill Creek RanchDelta Junction, AK 99737$1,045,715
5Eagles' Ridge Community Church IncDelta Junction, AK 99737$1,034,011
6Ronald J RobinsonDelta Junction, AK 99737$967,807
7Pamela M RuleDelta Junction, AK 99737$895,913
8Marlene J RobinsonDelta Junction, AK 99737$824,465
9Scott W SchultzDelta Junction, AK 99737$811,770
10Schultz Farms IncDelta Junction, AK 99737$798,120
11Insanity AcresDelta Junction, AK 99737$714,410
12Michael A SchultzDelta Junction, AK 99737$711,077
13Dennis D. And Cleo V. Green RevocDelta Junction, AK 99737$600,250
14Stevens Village Ira CouncilStevens Village, AK 99774$558,628
15Theuringer FarmDelta Junction, AK 99737$552,435
16Brenda PetersonDelta Junction, AK 99737$446,911
17John R TheuringerDelta Junction, AK 99737$424,254
18Coplee International IncKodiak, AK 99615$403,467
19Kent E SteeleDelta Junction, AK 99737$381,748
20Ione K Strong Second TrustStockbridge, GA 30281$370,178

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>


Farm Subsidies Education