Total Disaster Programs in Arizona, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 9,035
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Arizona totaled $264,978,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Platt Cattle Company LLC | Saint Johns, AZ 85936 | $379,938 |
122 | Arizona Apiaries LLC | Waddell, AZ 85355 | $378,811 |
123 | C Bar S Land & Cattle Co LLC | Prescott, AZ 86301 | $378,321 |
124 | Thomas R Hamill | Kirkland, AZ 86332 | $376,401 |
125 | Joe Campbell | Seligman, AZ 86337 | $370,912 |
126 | Tonto Livestock Association | San Carlos, AZ 85550 | $369,315 |
127 | Glenn Ranch Corporation | Douglas, AZ 85608 | $368,165 |
128 | Sierra Farming Partnership II | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $367,492 |
129 | Borden Foods Corporation | Columbus, OH 43215 | $362,922 |
130 | Jd Cattle LLC | Skull Valley, AZ 86338 | $362,119 |
131 | Pistachios Unlimited | Vail, AZ 85641 | $361,930 |
132 | Button Farms | Sacaton, AZ 85147 | $353,800 |
133 | Jilmat Inc | Williams, AZ 86046 | $353,261 |
134 | Auza Ranches LLC | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $352,103 |
135 | Major Cattle Co LLC | Chino Valley, AZ 86323 | $347,828 |
136 | Spo Land And Cattle LLC | Springerville, AZ 85938 | $346,521 |
137 | Keith M Flake | Snowflake, AZ 85937 | $344,366 |
138 | Cross Mountain Sheep Co | Chandler, AZ 85226 | $342,781 |
139 | Prechel Farms | Coolidge, AZ 85228 | $342,181 |
140 | , | $340,343 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”