Emergency Conservation Program in Apache County, Arizona, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 149
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Apache County, Arizona totaled $155,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | David Roanhorse | Ganado, AZ 86505 | $5,338 |
| 2 | Herman Mineer | Saint Johns, AZ 85936 | $3,969 |
| 3 | Leon T Plant | Concho, AZ 85924 | $3,840 |
| 4 | Clifford A Thorn | Saint Johns, AZ 85936 | $3,291 |
| 5 | Patricia F Uentillie | Ganado, AZ 86505 | $3,270 |
| 6 | James Baldwin | Sanders, AZ 86512 | $3,184 |
| 7 | Timberline Cattle Co LLC | Vernon, AZ 85940 | $3,168 |
| 8 | J Albert Brown Ranches | Saint Johns, AZ 85936 | $2,985 |
| 9 | Holyan Tsosie | Chambers, AZ 86502 | $2,910 |
| 10 | Winnie Curley | Chambers, AZ 86502 | $2,888 |
| 11 | Jean J Bitsui | Saint Michaels, AZ 86511 | $2,854 |
| 12 | Sheep Springs Sheep Co LLC | Chandler, AZ 85248 | $2,784 |
| 13 | Johnny Benally Sr | Chinle, AZ 86503 | $2,640 |
| 14 | Dan Clark Sr | Teec Nos Pos, AZ 86514 | $2,400 |
| 15 | Faye Murphy | Saint Johns, AZ 85936 | $2,390 |
| 16 | Henry Yazzie | Chambers, AZ 86502 | $2,362 |
| 17 | Percy Dick Begay | Chambers, AZ 86502 | $2,333 |
| 18 | Mae Jean Silver | Chambers, AZ 86502 | $2,246 |
| 19 | Habannah O Ross | Fort Defiance, AZ 86504 | $2,156 |
| 20 | Alice Hale Joe | Sanders, AZ 86512 | $2,089 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf