Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Cochise County, Arizona, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 184
Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in Cochise County, Arizona totaled $4,317,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Environmental Quality Incentives Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chad A Koehn | Cochise, AZ 85606 | $152,130 |
| 2 | Edward Barnes | San Simon, AZ 85632 | $129,458 |
| 3 | Lesco Enterprises Inc | Bowie, AZ 85605 | $126,083 |
| 4 | Richard A Kester | Pearce, AZ 85625 | $106,710 |
| 5 | Cecilio Solis | Elfrida, AZ 85610 | $105,257 |
| 6 | Eight Mile Farm Incorporated | Bowie, AZ 85605 | $76,075 |
| 7 | Jeanette Pierce Rev Living Trust | San Simon, AZ 85632 | $74,537 |
| 8 | Western Cerro LLC | San Simon, AZ 85632 | $74,015 |
| 9 | Donna Mitchell | Elfrida, AZ 85610 | $73,050 |
| 10 | Blair Farms Inc | Lordsburg, NM 88045 | $68,189 |
| 11 | Glenn Williams | Elfrida, AZ 85610 | $67,500 |
| 12 | Milton Schmidt | Willcox, AZ 85643 | $61,693 |
| 13 | Mark Michaels | Willcox, AZ 85643 | $59,833 |
| 14 | Mike Hayhurst | Huachuca City, AZ 85616 | $59,086 |
| 15 | Calvin Allred | Willcox, AZ 85643 | $58,394 |
| 16 | Luna And Williams LLC | Elfrida, AZ 85610 | $57,500 |
| 17 | Harold L & Barbara H Abrams Trust | Cochise, AZ 85606 | $55,017 |
| 18 | Nathan Watkins | Mcneal, AZ 85617 | $54,491 |
| 19 | Hall Farms | Willcox, AZ 85643 | $52,254 |
| 20 | Rogers Farms | Pearce, AZ 85625 | $50,939 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf