Miscellaneous Conservation Programs in Mohave County, Arizona, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 32
Recipients of Miscellaneous Conservation Programs from farms in Mohave County, Arizona totaled $214,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Conservation Programs 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fort Mojave Tribe | Mohave Valley, AZ 86446 | $35,000 |
| 2 | Hancock Family Trust | Mohave Valley, AZ 86446 | $35,000 |
| 3 | Maverick Farms Inc | Mohave Valley, AZ 86446 | $29,376 |
| 4 | L Lavar Formaster | Saint George, UT 84770 | $17,487 |
| 5 | Anthony Heaton Family Limited Pts | Saint George, UT 84791 | $15,523 |
| 6 | Wagon Bow Ranch | Prescott, AZ 86302 | $12,612 |
| 7 | William M Gubler | Santa Clara, UT 84765 | $10,847 |
| 8 | Blake Ltd | St George, UT 84770 | $8,536 |
| 9 | Larry T Blake | Saint George, UT 84770 | $8,535 |
| 10 | Eddie M Bundy | Saint George, UT 84790 | $6,986 |
| 11 | Gevene E Savala | Fredonia, AZ 86022 | $6,674 |
| 12 | Bridlebit Three Cattle Co | Saint George, UT 84770 | $5,388 |
| 13 | Bar S Ranch Inc | Kingman, AZ 86401 | $3,500 |
| 14 | Rolands Investments Inc | Kingman, AZ 86401 | $3,500 |
| 15 | David Esplin & Co | Saint George, UT 84790 | $3,500 |
| 16 | W F Cattle Co Inc | Kingman, AZ 86401 | $3,040 |
| 17 | Anita M Waite | Kingman, AZ 86401 | $681 |
| 18 | Dean Walema Sr | Peach Springs, AZ 86434 | $542 |
| 19 | Willie Powskey | Peach Springs, AZ 86434 | $542 |
| 20 | Claudius Honga | Peach Springs, AZ 86434 | $542 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf