Cotton Transistion Assistance Program in Pima County, Arizona, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 23
Recipients of Cotton Transistion Assistance Program from farms in Pima County, Arizona totaled $539,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Cotton Transistion Assistance Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Post Farms | Marana, AZ 85653 | $74,161 |
| 2 | Ernest Bratton Etal Ptr Dba La Fa | Marana, AZ 85653 | $68,120 |
| 3 | Tnt Farms | Marana, AZ 85653 | $67,638 |
| 4 | Burruel & Burruel Farms Ptshp | Marana, AZ 85653 | $64,710 |
| 5 | Pacheco Farm Management & Consulting Co | Marana, AZ 85653 | $60,296 |
| 6 | Clark Farms Jv | Tucson, AZ 85743 | $37,414 |
| 7 | Jason Charles Walker | Casa Grande, AZ 85194 | $28,771 |
| 8 | Double D Farms Ptshp | Marana, AZ 85653 | $28,566 |
| 9 | John Walker | Casa Grande, AZ 85194 | $28,364 |
| 10 | Gaye Walker | Casa Grande, AZ 85194 | $28,364 |
| 11 | 3w Farms | Tucson, AZ 85742 | $12,327 |
| 12 | Fred Barnett Farms | Marana, AZ 85653 | $11,342 |
| 13 | Taylors Holsteins | Marana, AZ 85653 | $8,563 |
| 14 | Bridle Bit Ranch LLC | Marana, AZ 85653 | $4,113 |
| 15 | Herbert Kai | Rillito, AZ 85654 | $3,619 |
| 16 | Sonia Bratton | Marana, AZ 85653 | $3,579 |
| 17 | Tohono O'odham Farming Authority | Eloy, AZ 85131 | $2,195 |
| 18 | Twin Peaks Land & Cattle Company | Tucson, AZ 85716 | $1,858 |
| 19 | James E Glover Jr | Marana, AZ 85653 | $1,417 |
| 20 | Patrick Neal Whillock | Marana, AZ 85653 | $1,094 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf