Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Pima County, Arizona, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 36
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Pima County, Arizona totaled $1,044,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Post Farms | Marana, AZ 85653 | $217,915 |
2 | Vera Earl Ranch Inc | Sonoita, AZ 85637 | $196,625 |
3 | Zamora Farms | Tucson, AZ 85743 | $97,794 |
4 | Pacheco Farm Management & Consulting Co | Marana, AZ 85653 | $92,059 |
5 | Burruel & Burruel Farms Ptshp | Marana, AZ 85653 | $78,382 |
6 | Ls Cattle Company LLC | Phoenix, AZ 85012 | $35,569 |
7 | James K Chilton Jr | Arivaca, AZ 85601 | $34,485 |
8 | Navarro Ranch LLC | Green Valley, AZ 85622 | $34,210 |
9 | Dakota Shayne Harris | Dragoon, AZ 85609 | $27,720 |
10 | Double D Farms Ptshp | Marana, AZ 85653 | $25,410 |
11 | Arivaca Ranch LLC | Pritchett, CO 81064 | $21,175 |
12 | Bratton Farm & Harvest LLC | Chandler, AZ 85249 | $17,900 |
13 | Gaye Walker | Casa Grande, AZ 85194 | $17,845 |
14 | Manuel C Canez Jr | Tucson, AZ 85713 | $14,300 |
15 | C-5 Cattle Co LLC | Chandler, AZ 85249 | $11,825 |
16 | Savantos Land & Cattle LLC | Tucson, AZ 85746 | $11,330 |
17 | Michael Joseph Giardinelli | Cortaro, AZ 85652 | $10,037 |
18 | Parsons Co Inc | Marana, AZ 85653 | $9,735 |
19 | Diamond Bell Ranch Management Co LLC | Tucson, AZ 85736 | $9,240 |
20 | James Leon | Ajo, AZ 85321 | $7,150 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>