Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Pima County, Arizona, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 27
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Pima County, Arizona totaled $597,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vera Earl Ranch Inc | Sonoita, AZ 85637 | $140,621 |
| 2 | James K Chilton Jr | Arivaca, AZ 85601 | $78,027 |
| 3 | Diamond Bell Ranch Management Co LLC | Tucson, AZ 85736 | $38,721 |
| 4 | Dakota Shayne Harris | Dragoon, AZ 85609 | $36,108 |
| 5 | Ls Cattle Company LLC | Phoenix, AZ 85012 | $34,810 |
| 6 | Navarro Ranch LLC | Green Valley, AZ 85622 | $33,043 |
| 7 | C-spear LLC | Stanfield, AZ 85172 | $29,308 |
| 8 | James Leon | Ajo, AZ 85321 | $27,900 |
| 9 | C-5 Cattle Co LLC | Chandler, AZ 85249 | $27,397 |
| 10 | John F King & Son Inc | Tucson, AZ 85736 | $26,115 |
| 11 | Armer-kobernik Ptns LLC | Vail, AZ 85641 | $20,830 |
| 12 | Parsons Co Inc | Marana, AZ 85653 | $16,229 |
| 13 | Michael Andrew Claves | Cochise, AZ 85606 | $16,156 |
| 14 | Patrick Neal Whillock | Marana, AZ 85653 | $15,696 |
| 15 | Maria M Molina-whillock | Marana, AZ 85653 | $13,169 |
| 16 | Robinson Cattle LLC | Green Valley, AZ 85622 | $9,340 |
| 17 | Arivaca Ranch LLC | Pritchett, CO 81064 | $8,652 |
| 18 | Jesus G Arvizu | Tucson, AZ 85743 | $7,579 |
| 19 | Erik Heberle | Rillito, AZ 85654 | $6,855 |
| 20 | Andersen And Hammock Cattle Co LLC | Casa Grande, AZ 85194 | $2,945 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf