Total Disaster Programs in Pima County, Arizona, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 35
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Pima County, Arizona totaled $823,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Arivaca Ranch LLC | Pritchett, CO 81064 | $117,055 |
2 | Vera Earl Ranch Inc | Sonoita, AZ 85637 | $86,895 |
3 | James K Chilton Jr | Arivaca, AZ 85601 | $78,311 |
4 | John F King & Son Inc | Tucson, AZ 85736 | $48,418 |
5 | Burruel & Burruel Farms Ptshp | Marana, AZ 85653 | $40,670 |
6 | Diamond Bell Ranch Management Co LLC | Tucson, AZ 85736 | $32,284 |
7 | Bratton Farms & Harvest LLC | Chandler, AZ 85249 | $30,471 |
8 | Dakota Shayne Harris | Benson, AZ 85602 | $29,813 |
9 | Zamora Farms | Tucson, AZ 85743 | $27,621 |
10 | Navarro Ranch LLC | Green Valley, AZ 85622 | $27,249 |
11 | Ls Cattle Company LLC | Phoenix, AZ 85012 | $26,002 |
12 | Ja Bell Dba Sierrita Mining & Ranching Co | Sahuarita, AZ 85629 | $23,780 |
13 | C-5 Cattle Co LLC | Chandler, AZ 85249 | $22,619 |
14 | Pacheco Farm Management & Consulting Co | Marana, AZ 85653 | $18,677 |
15 | James Leon | Ajo, AZ 85321 | $17,917 |
16 | Armer-kobernik Ptns LLC | Vail, AZ 85641 | $16,929 |
17 | Andersen And Hammock Cattle Co LLC | Casa Grande, AZ 85194 | $16,574 |
18 | Savantos Land & Cattle LLC | Tucson, AZ 85746 | $15,646 |
19 | Patrick Neal Whillock | Marana, AZ 85653 | $15,484 |
20 | Parsons Co Inc | Marana, AZ 85653 | $13,406 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>