Miscellaneous Farm Programs in Pinal County, Arizona, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 262
Recipients of Miscellaneous Farm Programs from farms in Pinal County, Arizona totaled $73,300 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Farm Programs 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Todd Welch | Apache Junction, AZ 85119 | $10,771 |
| 2 | Rick Duane Versteeg | Florence, AZ 85132 | $7,659 |
| 3 | Tohono O'odham Farming Authority | Eloy, AZ 85131 | $6,422 |
| 4 | Nicholas T Welch | Apache Junction, AZ 85119 | $5,571 |
| 5 | Precision Farming | San Tan Valley, AZ 85143 | $1,937 |
| 6 | Marciano M Arias | Casa Grande, AZ 85222 | $1,880 |
| 7 | Christopher Jonathan Carranza | Stanfield, AZ 85172 | $1,793 |
| 8 | T & G Farms | Arizona City, AZ 85223 | $1,668 |
| 9 | Easterday Farms | Pasco, WA 99301 | $1,385 |
| 10 | S & S Harvesting | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $1,290 |
| 11 | Dane Farms | Willcox, AZ 85644 | $1,212 |
| 12 | Terry Bros Farms | Willcox, AZ 85643 | $1,088 |
| 13 | Jeffrey Odus Hughes | Casa Grande, AZ 85122 | $1,043 |
| 14 | Frank Shedd & Son Ptshp | Casa Grande, AZ 85193 | $1,026 |
| 15 | Ruby Farms | Coolidge, AZ 85128 | $945 |
| 16 | Hour Farms Inc | Casa Grande, AZ 85230 | $874 |
| 17 | Alligator Farms | Coolidge, AZ 85228 | $826 |
| 18 | Davis Farms | Casa Grande, AZ 85230 | $797 |
| 19 | Carranza Farms | Stanfield, AZ 85272 | $695 |
| 20 | Rancho Pobre Farms | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $678 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf