Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Pinal County, Arizona, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 264
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Pinal County, Arizona totaled $16,507,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ak-chin Farms | Maricopa, AZ 85138 | $1,039,245 |
| 2 | Casa Grande Dairy Company LLC | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $707,831 |
| 3 | Du-brook Dairy Inc | Casa Grande, AZ 85194 | $550,148 |
| 4 | Caballero Dairy Farms LLC | Chandler, AZ 85249 | $477,438 |
| 5 | Sawyer Cattle Company LLC | Maricopa, AZ 85138 | $473,150 |
| 6 | Santa Rosa Produce LLC | Maricopa, AZ 85139 | $450,000 |
| 7 | D & I Holsteins LLC | Stanfield, AZ 85172 | $442,781 |
| 8 | T & K Red River Dairy Ltd Ptshp | Stanfield, AZ 85172 | $384,187 |
| 9 | Van Der Waerden Dairy LLC | Maricopa, AZ 85139 | $375,000 |
| 10 | A & B Farms Partnership | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $372,289 |
| 11 | Richard Anglin Dairy Inc | Maricopa, AZ 85139 | $336,140 |
| 12 | Tohono O'odham Farming Authority | Eloy, AZ 85131 | $290,864 |
| 13 | Rio Blanco LLC | Chandler, AZ 85226 | $283,463 |
| 14 | Gila River Farms | Sacaton, AZ 85147 | $252,758 |
| 15 | Donley Farms | Casa Grande, AZ 85193 | $250,457 |
| 16 | David Feenstra Dba Feenstra Friesians | Stanfield, AZ 85172 | $250,000 |
| 17 | Milky Way Dairy LLC | Maricopa, AZ 85139 | $250,000 |
| 18 | Olen Petznick | Paradise Valley, AZ 85253 | $250,000 |
| 19 | Earl Petznick Jr | Paradise Valley, AZ 85253 | $250,000 |
| 20 | Windmill Dairy LLC Dba El Dorado Dairy | Casa Grande, AZ 85128 | $240,566 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf