Farm Subsidy information
Pinal County, Arizona
Total Subsidies in Pinal County, Arizona, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 345
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Pinal County, Arizona totaled $64,621,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Sasco Cattle Co LLC | Red Rock, AZ 85145 | $563,431 |
22 | Olen Petznick | Paradise Valley, AZ 85253 | $500,000 |
23 | Earl Petznick Jr | Paradise Valley, AZ 85253 | $500,000 |
24 | Catalina Farms | Eloy, AZ 85131 | $491,075 |
25 | J2 Marketing LLC | Chandler, AZ 85226 | $470,275 |
26 | F & A Cattle Company Inc | Stanfield, AZ 85172 | $469,296 |
27 | Double D Dairy Ltd | Stanfield, AZ 85172 | $455,580 |
28 | Santa Rosa Produce LLC | Maricopa, AZ 85139 | $450,000 |
29 | Windmill Dairy LLC Dba El Dorado Dairy | Casa Grande, AZ 85128 | $440,566 |
30 | Jerry D Ethington | Queen Creek, AZ 85140 | $440,383 |
31 | Hiscox Farms Gp | Coolidge, AZ 85128 | $440,304 |
32 | Keeling Family Ptshp | Casa Grande, AZ 85193 | $439,325 |
33 | Desperado Dairy LLC | Casa Grande, AZ 85194 | $439,008 |
34 | Cattlemex Inc. | Tubac, AZ 85646 | $430,290 |
35 | Terra Firma | Casa Grande, AZ 85194 | $421,302 |
36 | River Bush Farms | Eloy, AZ 85131 | $420,211 |
37 | David Feenstra Dba Feenstra Friesians | Stanfield, AZ 85172 | $410,922 |
38 | John P Hofferth | Glendale, AZ 85308 | $405,925 |
39 | Melonco, LLC | Chandler, AZ 85226 | $403,117 |
40 | Milky Way Dairy LLC | Maricopa, AZ 85139 | $384,590 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”