Total Commodity Programs in Pinal County, Arizona, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 213
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Pinal County, Arizona totaled $33,224,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Ak-chin Farms | Maricopa, AZ 85138 | $2,310,762 |
2 | Tohono O'odham Farming Authority | Eloy, AZ 85131 | $1,189,559 |
3 | Gila River Farms | Sacaton, AZ 85147 | $1,134,188 |
4 | T-k Farms | Stanfield, AZ 85172 | $1,111,104 |
5 | Donley Farms | Casa Grande, AZ 85193 | $1,073,622 |
6 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $1,044,633 |
7 | A & B Farms Partnership | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $984,501 |
8 | Tempe Farming Co | Maricopa, AZ 85139 | $922,309 |
9 | Sierra Farming Partnership III | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $760,574 |
10 | Fast Track Farms | Casa Grande, AZ 85194 | $567,193 |
11 | Rio Farming General Partnership | Chandler, AZ 85249 | $510,903 |
12 | Catalina Farms | Eloy, AZ 85131 | $441,386 |
13 | Ramona Enterprises LLC | Sacaton, AZ 85147 | $409,264 |
14 | Terra Firma | Casa Grande, AZ 85194 | $405,750 |
15 | Itty Bitty Farms | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $385,649 |
16 | Agri-bella Farms LLC | Maricopa, AZ 85139 | $377,752 |
17 | River Bush Farms | Eloy, AZ 85131 | $340,304 |
18 | Brynn-con Farms | Casa Grande, AZ 85193 | $334,737 |
19 | Silver Bullet Farms | Casa Grande, AZ 85194 | $319,607 |
20 | Mark D Smith Enterprises Inc | Stanfield, AZ 85172 | $315,562 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>