Miscellaneous Conservation Programs in Yavapai County, Arizona, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 22
Recipients of Miscellaneous Conservation Programs from farms in Yavapai County, Arizona totaled $217,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Conservation Programs 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cross U Cattle Co | Mc Neal, AZ 85617 | $17,500 |
| 2 | Indian Rock Ranches Inc | Santa Fe, NM 87501 | $17,500 |
| 3 | Jw Kieckhefer Foundation | Prescott, AZ 86302 | $17,500 |
| 4 | Gerald E Dunbar | Chino Valley, AZ 86323 | $17,500 |
| 5 | Harry Banker | Phoenix, AZ 85018 | $17,500 |
| 6 | Edward Applebee | Chino Valley, AZ 86323 | $17,487 |
| 7 | Perkins Ranch Inc | Chino Valley, AZ 86323 | $14,597 |
| 8 | Edward O Holmes | Chino Valley, AZ 86323 | $14,500 |
| 9 | Stanley Stazenski | Prescott, AZ 86302 | $13,500 |
| 10 | Yavapai Ranch Lp | Scottsdale, AZ 85253 | $12,487 |
| 11 | Monty Lightfoot | Rimrock, AZ 86335 | $10,000 |
| 12 | Colonel C Lightfoot | Rimrock, AZ 86335 | $10,000 |
| 13 | Hugh Campbell Family Trust | Seligman, AZ 86337 | $7,000 |
| 14 | Do Not Use Ch Ltd Partnership | Scottsdale, AZ 85253 | $5,013 |
| 15 | Jack Owen | Chino Valley, AZ 86323 | $4,805 |
| 16 | Peter T Robinson | Camp Verde, AZ 86322 | $3,500 |
| 17 | Pierce Properties Ltd Ptnshp | Prescott, AZ 86305 | $3,500 |
| 18 | William E Pierce | Chino Valley, AZ 86323 | $3,500 |
| 19 | William P Mahoney Jr | Chino Valley, AZ 86323 | $3,500 |
| 20 | Squaw Peak Ranch LLC | Scottsdale, AZ 85251 | $3,500 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf