Conservation Reserve Program in Arkansas County, Arkansas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 281
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Arkansas County, Arkansas totaled $1,502,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Ww Conservation Partnership | Little Rock, AR 72202 | $47,765 |
2 | Hasty Family Limited Ptrn | Almyra, AR 72003 | $38,442 |
3 | Gocio Family Farm Partners | Little Rock, AR 72227 | $38,230 |
4 | Nina Ruth Selig | Tichnor, AR 72166 | $32,622 |
5 | Ed Sollars Family Partnership | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $30,502 |
6 | Elton Gordon Farm Inc | De Witt, AR 72042 | $27,921 |
7 | John E Stephens Inc | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $25,272 |
8 | James Padgett Family Fm LLC | Ethel, AR 72048 | $23,507 |
9 | Carver Family Farm LLC | Cabot, AR 72023 | $20,592 |
10 | Rosie's Farm LLC | Little Rock, AR 72207 | $19,280 |
11 | Jerisa Land Co Inc | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $19,021 |
12 | Billy D Cotten | De Witt, AR 72042 | $18,946 |
13 | Katherine Truax Estate | Gillett, AR 72055 | $18,440 |
14 | James W Phillips | Crocketts Bluff, AR 72038 | $16,689 |
15 | Helms Family Farm Partnership | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $16,450 |
16 | J L Wilson Farms Inc | Little Rock, AR 72211 | $16,447 |
17 | Lagrue Farms Inc | De Witt, AR 72042 | $16,220 |
18 | Oscar Bell & Sons Inc | De Witt, AR 72042 | $16,208 |
19 | Owl City Hunting Club Inc | De Witt, AR 72042 | $15,556 |
20 | Larry Wallace | Tichnor, AR 72166 | $15,103 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>