Counter Cyclical Program in Chicot County, Arkansas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,032
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Chicot County, Arkansas totaled $33,560,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lane Farms | Eudora, AR 71640 | $666,848 |
| 2 | Epstein Land Co | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $660,467 |
| 3 | Vincent And Betty S Pieroni Farm | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $613,838 |
| 4 | Bill Elliott Jr & Bruce Elliott Ptr | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $582,254 |
| 5 | B & R Farms | Greenville, MS 38701 | $570,344 |
| 6 | Raymond L And Louise G Pieroni Farm Partnership | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $550,602 |
| 7 | Larry And Doreen Pieroni Farm Par | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $525,716 |
| 8 | Bobby Roark & Sons Partnership | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $505,728 |
| 9 | B Pieroni Farms | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $482,953 |
| 10 | Keith's Farms Partnership | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $482,491 |
| 11 | Hunter And Hunter Farms | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $459,354 |
| 12 | Sal Ranch Partnership | Eudora, AR 71640 | $454,679 |
| 13 | B & B Mencer Farm Partnership | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $449,722 |
| 14 | Lake Hall Farms Partnership | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $443,293 |
| 15 | A And J Mazzanti Partnership | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $359,471 |
| 16 | Circle V Farms | Eudora, AR 71640 | $344,384 |
| 17 | Robert E And Marilyn Dunavant Joint Venture | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $336,470 |
| 18 | Cash Bilberry Farm | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $305,101 |
| 19 | Sampolesi Farms | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $301,889 |
| 20 | Paul And Stacy Dunavant Farm | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $300,537 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf