Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Chicot County, Arkansas, 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 394

Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Chicot County, Arkansas totaled $34,995,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Market Facilitation Program (MFP)
1995-2021
1Bank Of Lake VillageLake Village, AR 71653$3,143,796
2Delta Production Credit Assn **Dermott, AR 71638$878,404
3Berkemeyer And Son PartnershipLake Village, AR 71653$785,501
4Steritz AgLake Village, AR 71653$750,000
5Hensley FarmsEudora, AR 71640$745,268
6Bill Elliott Jr & Bruce Elliott PtrLake Village, AR 71653$702,052
7Bobby Roark & Sons PartnershipLake Village, AR 71653$696,174
8Simmons 1st National Bank **Lake Village, AR 71653$625,814
9Poole FarmsParkdale, AR 71661$536,324
10Matt And Lisa Fortenberry Joint VentureLake Providence, LA 71254$496,171
11Joe Mencer Farms PartnershipLake Village, AR 71653$494,077
12Bellaire Dynamik LLCCharlotte, NC 28273$484,289
13Claude And Diane Grubbs FarmsEudora, AR 71640$472,521
14Larry And Doreen Pieroni Farm ParLake Village, AR 71653$456,177
15Robert E And Marilyn Dunavant Joint VentureLake Village, AR 71653$446,350
16Ashton FarmsLake Village, AR 71653$439,998
17B & R FarmsGreenville, MS 38701$426,617
18Elliott Brothers Farm PartnershipLake Village, AR 71653$411,836
19M & T Farms PartnershipEudora, AR 71640$385,681
20Dalton FarmsPortland, AR 71663$369,077

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag