Conservation Reserve Program in Desha County, Arkansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 282
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Desha County, Arkansas totaled $14,193,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | The Coon LLC | Little Rock, AR 72212 | $201,210 |
22 | Gold Creek Land Company LLC | Hope, AR 71801 | $198,942 |
23 | Amanda Adcock Pambianchi Gst Trus | Mc Gehee, AR 71654 | $198,819 |
24 | Charles Kenneth Sandifer | Arkadelphia, AR 71923 | $179,880 |
25 | Joseph Francis Wallace Trust | Mc Gehee, AR 71654 | $173,009 |
26 | Bob Brown | Dumas, AR 71639 | $165,823 |
27 | Wayne Smith | Watson, AR 71674 | $164,271 |
28 | Edgar Joe Jody Gannaway | Arkansas City, AR 71630 | $162,589 |
29 | Virginia Susanne Maxwell | Conway, AR 72034 | $157,052 |
30 | Mary C Wells | Mcgehee, AR 71654 | $156,200 |
31 | United Land & Tbr | Dumas, AR 71639 | $148,725 |
32 | Gus Wilson | Tillar, AR 71670 | $139,831 |
33 | Marie Watson | Arkansas City, AR 71630 | $139,337 |
34 | Trippe Cemetery Perpetual Care Tr | Mc Gehee, AR 71654 | $127,070 |
35 | Mcgehee Farm And Real Estate Comp | Mc Gehee, AR 71654 | $125,479 |
36 | Dermott Farms | Memphis, TN 38138 | $121,394 |
37 | David R Thompson | Mc Gehee, AR 71654 | $117,985 |
38 | Peacock & Staudinger Farms | Winchester, AR 71677 | $110,722 |
39 | R L Beck III | Harrison, AR 72601 | $110,402 |
40 | Andrea E Beck | Harrison, AR 72601 | $110,402 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”