Conservation Reserve Program in Desha County, Arkansas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 98
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Desha County, Arkansas totaled $602,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Winchester Land Co Inc | Monticello, AR 71657 | $60,992 |
| 2 | R A Pickens & Son | Pickens, AR 71662 | $40,432 |
| 3 | Amanda Adcock Pambianchi Gst Trus | Mc Gehee, AR 71654 | $35,474 |
| 4 | Gold Creek Land Company LLC | Hope, AR 71801 | $30,594 |
| 5 | Stephen M Fuller | Tillar, AR 71670 | $26,065 |
| 6 | The Coon LLC | Little Rock, AR 72212 | $25,312 |
| 7 | Robert Moore Jr | Arkansas City, AR 71630 | $21,387 |
| 8 | Mcgehee Farm And Real Estate An A | Mc Gehee, AR 71654 | $18,146 |
| 9 | Howard A Rands Sr Trust | Dumas, AR 71639 | $16,212 |
| 10 | Gould Farms Inc | Mc Gehee, AR 71654 | $16,053 |
| 11 | R L Beck III | Harrison, AR 72601 | $15,475 |
| 12 | Andrea E Beck | Harrison, AR 72601 | $15,475 |
| 13 | Lucille Delma Sandifer | Arkadelphia, AR 71923 | $14,112 |
| 14 | Mary Gannaway Tucker | Monticello, AR 71655 | $13,895 |
| 15 | United Land & Tbr | Dumas, AR 71639 | $12,160 |
| 16 | Mccallie Bros Inc | Irving, TX 75063 | $11,470 |
| 17 | Ronnie Hayes | Star City, AR 71667 | $10,534 |
| 18 | Wayne Smith | Watson, AR 71674 | $9,319 |
| 19 | Kemp Land Co Inc | Rohwer, AR 71666 | $8,880 |
| 20 | Bobby E Brown Sr Fam Tr | Dumas, AR 71639 | $8,844 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf