Loan Deficiency in Lawrence County, Arkansas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,113
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Lawrence County, Arkansas totaled $35,411,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Darrell Brady & Sons Ptr | Walnut Ridge, AR 72476 | $919,351 |
| 2 | Cox Cox & Stone Partnership | Walnut Ridge, AR 72476 | $898,913 |
| 3 | Clover Bend Fms | Jonesboro, AR 72404 | $779,594 |
| 4 | M & B Farms Ptr | Walnut Ridge, AR 72476 | $741,895 |
| 5 | D & T Farms Partnership | Walnut Ridge, AR 72476 | $730,421 |
| 6 | B E & S Farms Partnership | Hoxie, AR 72433 | $523,188 |
| 7 | Tinsley Farms Ptn | Walnut Ridge, AR 72476 | $456,045 |
| 8 | Farmview Partnership | Walnut Ridge, AR 72476 | $402,150 |
| 9 | Minturn Farms Inc | Hoxie, AR 72433 | $348,324 |
| 10 | Sunrise Farms | Walnut Ridge, AR 72476 | $328,942 |
| 11 | J & M Farms Ptr | Hoxie, AR 72433 | $275,127 |
| 12 | Eddie Burris | Alicia, AR 72410 | $261,199 |
| 13 | Crisler And Farmer Inc | O Kean, AR 72449 | $258,663 |
| 14 | F C A Trucking Inc | Walnut Ridge, AR 72476 | $256,760 |
| 15 | Penn Brothers Ptr | Portia, AR 72457 | $251,597 |
| 16 | Joe Richardson Farms Inc | Hoxie, AR 72433 | $250,807 |
| 17 | Wesley Gene Davis | Egypt, AR 72427 | $242,864 |
| 18 | Agri Marketing Inc | Walnut Ridge, AR 72476 | $240,401 |
| 19 | Randy Williams | Egypt, AR 72427 | $230,683 |
| 20 | Stan Crisler | Walnut Ridge, AR 72476 | $226,502 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf