Cotton Ginning Program in Lonoke County, Arkansas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 38
Recipients of Cotton Ginning Program from farms in Lonoke County, Arkansas totaled $358,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Cotton Ginning Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Brantley Farming Co | England, AR 72046 | $192,044 |
2 | Bearskin Farms | Scott, AR 72142 | $85,460 |
3 | Bransford Farming Company | Lonoke, AR 72086 | $18,170 |
4 | Thomas D Smith Inc | England, AR 72046 | $14,922 |
5 | Christian-harris Properties | Little Rock, AR 72212 | $4,635 |
6 | Putt & Florence Smith Farms LLC | England, AR 72046 | $3,949 |
7 | Mcneil Real Estate LLC | England, AR 72046 | $2,692 |
8 | Farm Trust | England, AR 72046 | $2,594 |
9 | Betty Mabrey | Little Rock, AR 72207 | $2,310 |
10 | Mark C Lyons | Little Rock, AR 72210 | $2,267 |
11 | Katherine Ilene Norman Tr Of The Norman Family Tr | Collierville, TN 38017 | $2,105 |
12 | Fielding Maxwell Norman Tr Of The Norman Family Tr | Collierville, TN 38027 | $2,105 |
13 | Jamie Shell Williams Revocable Tr | Hot Springs, AR 71913 | $2,043 |
14 | Orlan E Roper | England, AR 72046 | $1,796 |
15 | Capps Family LLC | Humnoke, AR 72072 | $1,578 |
16 | Walls Capps Farms LLC | Broken Arrow, OK 74014 | $1,506 |
17 | V & S Investment LLC | Sheridan, AR 72150 | $1,496 |
18 | B F Murchison Jr | Albuquerque, NM 87111 | $1,473 |
19 | Barnes Farm Ptshp | England, AR 72046 | $1,296 |
20 | Mars Inc | England, AR 72046 | $1,268 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>