Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Phillips County, Arkansas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 484
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Phillips County, Arkansas totaled $14,043,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Deline Farms Partnership | Charleston, MO 63834 | $1,079,558 |
2 | Deline Farms South | Charleston, MO 63834 | $617,213 |
3 | Rickey Helton Farms | West Helena, AR 72390 | $331,453 |
4 | Long Lake Plantation | Helena, AR 72342 | $290,877 |
5 | Sunset Farms | West Helena, AR 72390 | $265,269 |
6 | Young And Co | Poplar Grove, AR 72374 | $251,849 |
7 | Storey Farming | Marvell, AR 72366 | $223,445 |
8 | Kendall Farms | Poplar Grove, AR 72374 | $208,890 |
9 | Kenna Farms | Mellwood, AR 72367 | $208,372 |
10 | Kale & Kale | Poplar Grove, AR 72374 | $205,673 |
11 | Whitetail Farms | Marvell, AR 72366 | $203,067 |
12 | Tolar Lakeridge Farms | Poplar Grove, AR 72374 | $200,314 |
13 | King Farms | Helena, AR 72342 | $198,110 |
14 | W E Jackson Farms | Marvell, AR 72366 | $192,106 |
15 | Stephens Partnership | West Helena, AR 72390 | $184,867 |
16 | Rohrscheib Family Farms | Lexa, AR 72355 | $182,712 |
17 | Tmg Farms | Helena, AR 72342 | $180,762 |
18 | Beaver Bayou Partnership | Lexa, AR 72355 | $177,981 |
19 | Btc Farms | Helena, AR 72342 | $173,899 |
20 | R And M Farms | Snow Lake, AR 72379 | $156,594 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>