Conservation Reserve Program in Pulaski County, Arkansas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 37
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Pulaski County, Arkansas totaled $169,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Craig Planting Co Inc | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $18,610 |
2 | Ronnie Walderns | Little Rock, AR 72206 | $15,746 |
3 | James Mart Averitt II | Scott, AR 72142 | $14,997 |
4 | Jack Tyler Family LLC | Little Rock, AR 72209 | $12,823 |
5 | Ralph E Ray Jr Settlement Trust | Abingdon, MD 21009 | $11,855 |
6 | Elizabeth T Dougan | North Little Rock, AR 72117 | $10,191 |
7 | Kathy Ratcliffe | Little Rock, AR 72210 | $8,643 |
8 | Adam Ratcliffe | Bentonville, AR 72712 | $8,643 |
9 | Michael L Parker | Carlisle, AR 72024 | $8,434 |
10 | Jimmy B Sims | Scott, AR 72142 | $7,978 |
11 | Dorothy Myers Farms | Cabot, AR 72023 | $5,862 |
12 | Rem Bayou LLC | Little Rock, AR 72202 | $4,862 |
13 | Rolling Hills Farms | Little Rock, AR 72223 | $3,540 |
14 | Smith Family Farm | North Little Rock, AR 72116 | $3,534 |
15 | Robert Horton | England, AR 72046 | $3,198 |
16 | Westbrook Farms LLC | Little Rock, AR 72227 | $2,864 |
17 | Coleman & Sarah Westbrook Joint Revocable Trust | North Little Rock, AR 72117 | $2,742 |
18 | George West | Little Rock, AR 72205 | $2,685 |
19 | Clear Lake Planting Co Inc | England, AR 72046 | $2,617 |
20 | Ann Hall Robinson Revocable Trust | Novato, CA 94947 | $2,245 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>